Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-08-30
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
The charts present the average proportion in typical meals of three various of nutrients , all of which may be unhealthy while intake much more.
Overall, in the dinner time period were the maximum number of people consumed sodium, saturated fat and added sugar. Similarly the minimum amount of nutrient consumed was sodium in both snacks and breakfast. Moreover saturated fat and added sugar intake in the earlier breakfast were same number of consumed.
All the three types of nutrients were consumed exceed in the dinner time which were sodium and saturated fat at 43% and 37 %.Therefore added sugar was included more in snacks time at 42%. In addition sodium was comparatively same percent taken in snack and breakfast at 14% ,although saturated fat and added sugar at 16% intake in the both breakfast period.
On the other hand added sugar was included not much in afternoon lunch time at 19% whereas sodium and saturated fat were more included in the lunch hour at 29% and 26%.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0
The response addresses the task by identifying key trends, such as the high consumption of nutrients at dinner. However, the analysis is hampered by significant inaccuracies in data reporting. For instance, the claim that 'saturated fat and added sugar intake in the earlier breakfast were same number' is not supported by the charts, and the description of percentages is often confusing or contradictory. While the main features are highlighted, the lack of precision in interpreting the data prevents a higher score. To improve, ensure that every figure cited is accurately reflected from the source material and avoid making generalizations that the data does not support.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0
The essay is organized into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the progression of ideas is often disjointed, and the use of cohesive devices is frequently mechanical or misused. Phrases like 'in the dinner time period were the maximum number of people consumed' are grammatically awkward and impede the flow of information. Referencing is sometimes unclear, making it difficult to track which nutrient or meal is being discussed. Improving the use of linking words and ensuring that each sentence logically follows the previous one would significantly enhance the coherence of the response.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The range of vocabulary is limited and often repetitive. There are frequent errors in word choice and collocation, such as 'intake much more' instead of 'excessive intake' and 'comparatively same percent taken'. These errors occasionally make the meaning unclear. The student relies on basic vocabulary to describe the data, which restricts the ability to provide a sophisticated analysis. To reach a higher band, the student should focus on using more precise terminology related to data description, such as 'proportion', 'consumption', 'significant', and 'marginal', while ensuring these words are used in the correct context.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The response contains a high frequency of grammatical errors, including issues with subject-verb agreement, sentence structure, and preposition usage. For example, 'three various of nutrients' is incorrect, and 'all the three types of nutrients were consumed exceed in the dinner time' is syntactically flawed. While the student attempts to use complex sentence structures, these are often poorly formed, leading to a lack of clarity. The majority of sentences contain errors that, while not completely preventing communication, require the reader to re-read to understand the intended meaning. Focusing on basic sentence construction and proofreading for common errors would be beneficial.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.