Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-09-18

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The rendered pie charts illustrate the information about three types of nutrients in typical meals, which might be unhealthy for health if eaten soo much. The data is calibrated in ratio.

After taking the statistical data into account, it may infer that the highest proportion of sodium in meals consumed by americans in dinner which are noticed as 43%. followed by the percentage of sodium in meals consumed by the people who residing in United states in lunch which are recorded as 29%. however, only 14% of sodium was consumed by american citizens in meals . Suprisingly, the similarity of 16% had been observed as saturated fat and added sugar in breakfast.

Turning towards the rest of details, it can be clearly seen that the percentum of added sugar in snacks, lunch as well as dinner which are noticed as 19%, 42% and 23% respectively . Moreover, the 37%, 26% as well as 21% of saturated fat was consumed by americans through dinner, lunch and snacks orderly.

Overall, it is readily apparent that the majority of the nutrients are consumed by americans in dinner meals as compared to others.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The student attempts to address the task by reporting data from the charts regarding sodium, saturated fat, and added sugar. However, there are significant data transcription and reading errors. For instance, the student states that the percentage of added sugar in snacks, lunch, and dinner is 19%, 42%, and 23% respectively, whereas the chart shows snacks at 42%, lunch at 23%, and dinner at 19%. Furthermore, the phrasing mixes up categories and data points, showing a lack of precision in reporting main features and comparisons. An overview is attempted at the end, but the overall accuracy and selection of key features fall short of higher bands. This performance aligns with a Band 5.0.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The response is organized into four paragraphs, including an introduction and a brief conclusion, showing some structural organization. However, the progression of ideas is frequently disrupted by awkward referencing and mechanical or inaccurate cohesive devices, such as 'Turning towards the rest of details' and 'orderly'. Paragraphing is attempted, but internal cohesion within sentences often breaks down, making the flow somewhat disjointed and hard to follow in places. This corresponds to a Band 5.0.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is basic and repetitive, with noticeable word choice and collocation errors (e.g., 'calibrated in ratio', 'may infer', 'people who residing', 'percentum'). There are also spelling errors like 'Suprisingly'. The student attempts some less common vocabulary, but these attempts are frequently inaccurate and impede smooth reading, limiting the lexical range to a minimally adequate level. This merits a Band 5.0.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The response exhibits a very limited range of grammatical structures, and attempts at complex sentences are frequently faulty (e.g., 'the highest proportion of sodium in meals consumed by americans in dinner which are noticed as 43%'). There are numerous grammatical errors involving verb forms, passive/active voice confusion, and missing articles. These frequent errors cause some difficulty for the reader and demonstrate poor control over complex sentence patterns. This corresponds to a Band 4.5, rounded to a Band 5.0 descriptor profile.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.