Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-10-06

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The charts underneath exhibit the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

In the summary, The average percentagesof sodium , saturated fats and added sugars in typical meals comsumed in the USA. Overall, it is clear that dinner exhibits the highest levels of sodium and saturated fat consumption, while breakfast shows the opposite trend. In addition, snacks contain the greatest percentage of added sugar among the four meals mentioned.

Looking closely at the charts, dinner contains the highest average sodium and saturated fat content, making up 43% and 37% of total consumption respectively, followed by lunch, accounting for 29% sodium and 26% saturated fat. In contrast, the figures for added sugar in these two meals are considerably lower (23% for supper and 19% for luncheon).

As for snacks and breakfast, the proportions of sodium consumed are the same, at 14%. In the case of saturated fat, the greater percentage is found in snacks, registering 21%, than in breakfasts, at 16%. By comparison, added sugar emerges as the most prevalent nutritional component in snacks (42%), while the opposite is true for breakfast with the lowest intake of added sugar and saturated fat, both accounting for 16%.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response7.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.5

The response selects the main patterns accurately and gives a clear overview: dinner has the highest sodium and saturated-fat shares, while snacks lead in added sugar. The comparisons are supported with relevant figures, including dinner’s 43% sodium and 37% saturated fat, and snacks’ 42% added sugar. It also notes the equal sodium shares for breakfast and snacks and identifies breakfast’s low figures. This is a strong, well-focused account of the chart. To make the reporting more consistently precise, avoid describing the percentages as “consumption” or “intake” where the chart shows each nutrient’s share across meal types; also use the chart’s meal labels consistently, since “supper” and “luncheon” are not the labels shown. The opening summary sentence is incomplete and adds little to the report.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure, moving from an overview to comparisons of dinner and lunch, then snacks and breakfast. Linking phrases such as “In contrast,” “As for,” and “By comparison” help signal relationships between the figures. However, cohesion is sometimes mechanical, and the opening paragraph contains a fragment: “In the summary, The average percentages…” This interrupts the progression and repeats the task framing rather than introducing the overview smoothly. Some comparisons are also packed into long sentences, particularly the final sentence, which combines snack and breakfast findings. Use a concise introduction, then organise the details into clearly focused comparisons; ensure each linking phrase connects ideas without creating unnecessary repetition.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

There is an adequate range of vocabulary for describing data, including “highest,” “followed by,” “accounting for,” and “proportions.” Some less common choices, such as “prevalent” and “registering,” show an attempt to vary expression, though they are not always the most natural collocations for chart reporting. “Nutritional component” is also imprecise when referring to added sugar, sodium, and saturated fat, while “supper” and “luncheon” depart from the chart’s straightforward labels. Spelling errors in “percentagesof” and “comsumed” are noticeable but do not prevent understanding. Prefer precise, consistent terms such as “share,” “percentage,” and the chart’s meal names, and check spelling and spacing carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

The response uses a mix of simple and complex structures, including participle phrases such as “making up 43% and 37%” and contrast clauses introduced by “while.” Most relationships remain understandable, but some grammatical and punctuation errors are present. The sentence beginning “In the summary, The average percentages…” is a fragment rather than a complete sentence, and the capital letter after the comma is incorrect. There are also spacing and punctuation problems around “percentagesof sodium ,” and the final sentence’s construction, “the opposite is true for breakfast with the lowest intake,” is awkwardly joined. Build complete sentences with clear subjects and verbs, and proofread punctuation and sentence boundaries.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.