Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The given pie charts illustrate the proportion of three distinct types of nutrients in meals . However,if this nutrients eaten too much it would be harmful.

Overall,it can be clearly seen from the charts that sodium accounts highest percentage at dinner whereas it least consumed in breakfast .

It is interesting to note that lunch registered a quarter of saturated fat in it while in snacks it contributed almost a fifths . Furthermore,dinner contains the uppermost fraction of saturated fat by 37% and the breakfast consumed the least proportion of saturated fat by 16%.Moreover,snacks accounted the peak percentage of added sugar by two fifths.In addtion to this,breakfast has least fraction of added sugar by 16% and 19% registered by lunch respectively.Similarly,breakfast and snacks contributed the same percentage of consuming sodium while lunch provided double of it .Hence,dinner has consumed the maximum proportion of sodium by 43% compared to other three categories.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You identify the main patterns accurately: dinner has the highest shares of sodium and saturated fat, while snacks lead in added sugar; you also note breakfast’s low figures. The specific comparisons are generally grounded in the charts, including 43% sodium at dinner and 42% added sugar in snacks. This covers the task well and shows some selection of key features. However, the overview is brief and focuses mainly on sodium, while the other major contrast—snacks’ high added sugar compared with its lower sodium and fat—is not clearly brought together. Some details are also imprecise: lunch’s saturated fat is 26%, not a quarter, and “double” for lunch sodium is only approximate. A more balanced overview and precise comparisons would strengthen the report.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable sequence: an introduction, an overall statement, and then comparisons across the meal categories. Linking expressions such as “Furthermore,” “Moreover,” and “Similarly” help signal relationships between points. However, the body is presented as one long paragraph, and the repeated transitions make the progression feel list-like rather than clearly grouped. The discussion moves between saturated fat, added sugar, and sodium without a consistent structure, and “breakfast has least fraction … and 19% registered by lunch respectively” is difficult to follow. Grouping the information by nutrient, with clear comparisons within each group, would make the organisation more coherent and reduce reliance on repeated connectors.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a range of task-related terms, including “proportion,” “fraction,” “accounts,” and “contributed,” and the reader can generally understand the comparisons. There are also attempts at more formal reporting language. However, several choices are unnatural or imprecise, such as “the uppermost fraction,” “consuming sodium,” and “lunch registered a quarter of saturated fat in it.” Some phrases repeat the same idea without adding precision, and spelling errors such as “addtion” are noticeable. Aim for straightforward, accurate collocations commonly used to describe charts—for example, “accounted for,” “the highest share,” and “the lowest proportion.” This would make the vocabulary more natural and the data descriptions clearer.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more extended sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “whereas” and “while,” and most of the intended comparisons remain understandable. However, there are several errors in sentence construction and control. For example, “if this nutrients eaten too much it would be harmful” lacks a correctly formed conditional clause, while “sodium accounts highest percentage” is missing an article and the preposition “for.” Agreement and article use are also inconsistent in “breakfast has least fraction” and “dinner contains the uppermost fraction.” Punctuation spacing is uneven, with missing spaces after commas and full stops. Use complete, carefully checked sentences and vary structures only when you can maintain accurate grammar.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.