Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-10-07
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 6.5)
The three pie charts illustrate the average percentages of sodium, saturated fat, and added sugar cosnumed in typical meals in the USA. The figures are divided into breakfast, lunch, dinnner, and snacks.
Overall, there can be noted acording to this pie chart dinner accounts for the largest porportion of sodium and saturated fat, while snacks are resposible for the highest percentage of added sugar. Breakfat contributes the smallest or one of the smallest porportions for all three nutrients.
To begin with data comparison regarding sodium, dinner makes up the highest percentage at 43 percent followed by lunch at 29 percent. Breakfat and snacks each account for only 14 percent. A similar pattern can be seen for saturated fat. Dinner is again the largest contributor, at 37percent, while lunch represents 26 percent. Snacks accounts for 21 percent and breakfast the the lowest figure, at 16 percent.
In addition, the pattern for added sugar is quite different. Snacks are by far the biggest source, at 42 percent, which is almost twice the figure for dinner, at 23 percent. Lunch contributes 19 percent, whereas breakfast has the smallest proportion, at 16 percent.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 7.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 7.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.5
The response selects the main features accurately and supports them with relevant figures: dinner is correctly identified as the largest source of sodium and saturated fat, while snacks lead for added sugar. The comparisons between dinner and lunch, and the contrast between the added-sugar pattern and the other nutrients, make the summary informative. The overview also notes breakfast’s generally low shares. To strengthen the report further, make that overview more precise: breakfast is tied with snacks for the lowest sodium share, rather than simply being the smallest or one of the smallest across all nutrients. The data are otherwise reported consistently, and the key patterns are clearly addressed.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0
The organisation is clear and purposeful: an introduction is followed by an overview, a paragraph comparing sodium and saturated fat, and a final paragraph on added sugar. This creates a logical progression from the shared pattern to the main contrast. Linking expressions such as “To begin with,” “A similar pattern,” and “In addition” help guide the reader, although some transitions are somewhat formulaic. The overview’s “Overall” sentence is useful, but its phrasing is slightly awkward and could state the contrast more directly. For smoother cohesion, use more concise links and avoid repeating the same meal-by-meal reporting structure where a direct comparison would connect the figures more naturally.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.0
The response uses an adequate range of task-relevant vocabulary, including “accounts for,” “contributes,” “largest contributor,” and “proportion,” and the meaning remains clear. There are, however, several spelling errors, including “cosnumed,” “dinnner,” “acording,” “resposible,” and “Breakfat.” These reduce the accuracy and polish of the vocabulary. Some phrasing is also imprecise or awkward: “there can be noted according to this pie chart” is not a natural way to introduce an overview, and “porportion” is misspelled. Aim for accurate spelling and more natural collocations, such as “the charts show” or “dinner accounts for.” This would make the vocabulary more controlled and precise.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0
There is a mix of simple and more developed sentence forms, and most relationships between figures are expressed clearly. For example, “Snacks are by far the biggest source, at 42 percent, which is almost twice the figure for dinner” combines a comparison with a relative clause. Some grammatical errors remain. In “Snacks accounts for 21 percent,” the plural subject requires “account”; “the the lowest figure” contains a duplicated article; and “there can be noted according to this pie chart” has an awkward, faulty construction. Spacing in “37percent” also needs correction. Review subject–verb agreement, articles, and sentence framing, while retaining the clear comparative structures already used.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
