Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-10-12

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The pie chart illustrates the proportion of sadium, saturated fats and added sugar in tyical meals consumtion in the United states.

Overall, dinner is the major provider of sadium and saturated fat, while snaks are the leading source of added suger. These figures highlighted the importance of being caation about intake of these potientially unhealthy nutrients, especially in the dinner and snaks time.

For sodium, dinner accounts for the largest share at 43%, followed by the luch which is 29%. Breakfast and snacks were consituated at 14%. These indicate dinner is the main source of sodium in the American diet.

Regarding saturated fat, dinner also take the biggest portion at 37%, while luch make up 26%. Snacks provide 21% and breakfast at 16%. It showed a similar pattern to sodium, with dinner being a significant contriber.

In terms of added sugar, snacks are the main contributer at 42%, followed by the dinner at 23%. Lunch stands out at 19% and breakfast hold 16%.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

The response selects the main features accurately: dinner has the highest shares of sodium and saturated fat, while snacks lead for added sugar. The reported figures match the chart, including dinner’s 43% sodium and 37% saturated fat, and snacks’ 42% added sugar. The overview is clear and the body covers all three nutrients with relevant comparisons. This is a well-focused summary with key information supported by data. To make the account more fully developed, add a little more synthesis across the charts—for example, note that breakfast is the lowest or joint-lowest contributor in each category, and compare how the meal shares vary overall. The comment about the importance of being cautious is a general implication rather than a chart feature, so prioritise direct comparisons.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall progression: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for sodium, saturated fat and added sugar. This makes the information easy to follow, and signposting such as “For sodium,” “Regarding saturated fat” and “In terms of added sugar” helps readers navigate the comparisons. The links between ideas are generally clear, though the repeated paragraph pattern and phrases such as “the main source” and “the biggest portion” make the organisation somewhat formulaic. Some references are also less precise: “These figures” in the overview refers broadly to the chart, while “These indicate” follows several figures without specifying the comparison. More varied linking and occasional cross-category comparisons would make the progression more flexible and cohesive.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The response uses relevant chart vocabulary, including “proportion,” “accounts for,” “largest share” and “main source,” so the meaning is generally recoverable. However, spelling errors are frequent and noticeable, including “sadium,” “tyical,” “snaks,” “suger,” “luch” and “contributer.” These reduce the accuracy and polish of the vocabulary. Some word combinations are also awkward, such as “dinner time” and “dinner is a significant contributor”; “the dinner meal” and “contributes a substantial share” would be more natural in this context. Aim to use a smaller set of precise terms consistently, and proofread spelling carefully. Accurate spelling and more natural collocations would make the otherwise relevant vocabulary more effective.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response includes a mix of simple statements and some more developed structures, such as “while snacks are the leading source of added sugar.” Most relationships between the figures remain understandable. However, errors in verb forms and sentence construction occur repeatedly: “dinner also take” should be “dinner also takes,” “breakfast hold” should be “breakfast holds,” and “while lunch make up” should be “while lunch makes up.” The sentence “Breakfast and snacks were consituated at 14%” also has an inaccurate grammatical construction; use “Breakfast and snacks each account for 14%.” There is some inconsistency in tense, with present-tense chart descriptions alongside “These figures highlighted” and “It showed.” Use the present tense consistently and check subject–verb agreement and sentence patterns.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.