Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-10-13

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The three pie charts illustrate the percentages of normal meals in three different categories of nutrients, unhealthy foods which are being consumed excessively.

Overall, dinner accounts the highest proportion of sodium and saturated fats consumption, while snacks has the highest percentage of added sugar. In contrast, breakfast has the smallest or one the lowest proportion of all three nutrients.

Regarding sodium, dinner contains the highest consumption of 43%, whereas 29% in lunch. Breakfast and snacks each accounts for 14%. A similar pattern can be observed for saturated fat, with dinner contributing 37% and representing 26% for lunch. Snacks accounts for 21%, while breakfast has the lowest percentage of 16.

In term of added sugar, snacks are the main contributor, accounting for 42% of the total, while dinner represents 23% and lunch contributes 19%. Breakfast includes the smallest proportion, at 16%. Dinner is the primary source of sodium and saturated fat, whereas snacks are the responsible for the greatest source of added sugar.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

The response selects the main features accurately: dinner is highest for sodium (43%) and saturated fat (37%), while snacks lead for added sugar (42%); the reported figures for the other meals also match the charts. The overview makes these contrasts clear and notes breakfast’s generally low shares. This is a well-focused summary with relevant comparisons and enough supporting data. To make the account more fully developed, avoid the slightly broad claim that breakfast has “the smallest or one the lowest proportion of all three nutrients”: it ties with snacks for sodium, and is lowest for saturated fat and added sugar. The final sentence repeats the overview rather than adding a further comparison, so using that space to highlight the contrast between dinner’s and snacks’ profiles would sharpen the summary.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The four-paragraph structure is appropriate: an introduction, a clear overview, and two detail paragraphs grouped by nutrient. The progression from sodium to saturated fat and then added sugar is easy to follow, and linking phrases such as “A similar pattern can be observed” help connect related information. This gives the response a coherent overall arrangement. However, some cohesion is mechanical or repetitive: “dinner” and “snacks” recur frequently, and the final sentence restates the overview without advancing the comparison. The phrase “In term of added sugar” also makes the transition less smooth. For stronger progression, use concise referencing where clear and make the final detail paragraph lead directly into a distinct concluding comparison rather than repeating earlier points.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.5

The vocabulary is adequate for describing chart data, with useful terms such as “accounts,” “proportion,” “contributor,” and “primary source.” The writer also varies some reporting language, for example “contains,” “contributing,” and “represents.” However, several collocations and word forms are imprecise: “percentages of normal meals in three different categories of nutrients” does not clearly express the chart’s subject, and “the responsible for the greatest source” is awkward. “Consumption” is also repeated where a simpler description of each meal’s share would be more natural. These choices do not prevent understanding, but they limit precision and naturalness. Aim for accurate chart-specific phrasing, such as “the share of each nutrient in typical meals” and “snacks account for the largest proportion of added sugar.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.5

The response uses a mix of simple and more complex structures, including the overview contrast with “while” and the comparison “with dinner contributing 37%.” Most sentences communicate the data clearly, and punctuation is generally controlled. Some grammatical errors remain, particularly with articles, agreement, and sentence construction. Examples include “dinner accounts the highest proportion,” which needs “accounts for,” and “snacks has,” where the plural subject requires “have.” In “whereas 29% in lunch,” the second clause is incomplete; write “whereas lunch accounts for 29%.” The phrase “In term of” also needs the plural form “terms.” More consistent control of these patterns, alongside varied but complete comparison clauses, would improve accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.