Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-10-19

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The charts depict the average percentage in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Overall, added sugars are most commonly present in snacks and the consumption is about 42%, sodium on the other hand is taken mostly in dinner about 43% and excessive amount of saturated fat is taken in dinner approximately 37%.

To begin with, everything that we eat in our daily life is important for our normal body fucntions. Sodium is crucial for our certain reactions that our body carried out in daily routines. We consumed 43% in dinner large intake of sodium cause negative impact to our body we face several kidney problems like stones and other health problems. However, saturated fat we consumed alot in our daily routine mostly we take this in our dinner around 37% it cause certain problems like obesity and due to this we also involved in hearth diseases.

Furthermore, we daily eat snacks which contains alot of added sugar in it which is very dangerous for our health this increased the possibility of having diabetes we take about 42% added sugar from snacks. Having everything in controlled manner ensures us the healthy lifestyle and also incrase in the duration of life.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify the main peaks accurately: added sugar is highest in snacks at 42%, while sodium and saturated fat peak at dinner, at 43% and 37%. The opening also establishes that the charts compare three nutrients across meals. However, the response only partially reports the visual information. It gives no figures for breakfast or lunch and does not compare the distributions across all four meal types; the overview is therefore narrow. Much of the body discusses health effects, such as kidney stones, obesity and diabetes, which are not shown in the charts and take space away from data reporting. Focus on the main comparisons and include a few contrasting figures, such as dinner versus breakfast for sodium.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has paragraph breaks and a basic sequence: an introduction, an overview, and two body paragraphs. Linking expressions such as “Overall,” “To begin with” and “Furthermore” help signal movement between sections. However, the progression is not consistently focused on summarising the charts: the discussion shifts from figures to general claims about nutrition and health, then to advice about a healthy lifestyle. Some connections are awkward, particularly “We consumed 43% in dinner” followed by a health consequence, so the relationship between data and explanation is unclear. Organise the body by comparing meal categories or nutrients, and use linking phrases to connect chart figures rather than introduce unrelated commentary.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “sodium,” “saturated fat,” “added sugar,” “consumption” and “percentage,” so the subject is generally clear. However, the range for describing data is limited, and several phrases are unnatural or imprecise: “taken mostly in dinner,” “large intake of sodium,” and “we daily eat snacks which contains alot of added sugar.” Repeated use of “we take” and “we consumed” also makes the report sound conversational rather than analytical. Spelling errors such as “fucntions,” “alot,” “hearth” and “incrase” are noticeable. Practise precise chart language such as “accounted for,” “was highest in,” and “compared with,” and check spelling before submitting.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response attempts both simple and more extended sentences, including a contrast with “Sodium, on the other hand…” and a conditional structure in “if eaten too much.” However, complex attempts are often faulty, and frequent errors sometimes make the meaning difficult to follow. For example, “We consumed 43% in dinner large intake of sodium cause…” joins clauses without appropriate punctuation or a clear grammatical link. There are also errors in agreement and verb forms, as in “snacks which contains” and “it cause,” as well as missing or incorrect articles and prepositions in phrases such as “in dinner.” Use shorter, complete sentences to report each comparison, then check subject–verb agreement, tense and sentence boundaries.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.