Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-10-20

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

This chart illustrates the average percentage in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Overall, Dinner have the highest amount of sodium, saturated fat and snacks have highest added sugar. in contrast breakfast have least amount of all of them however lunch ranks in middle.

Sodium presented 43% in dinner highest from all, followed by lunch at 29% while the snacks and breakfast have similar level of sodium around 14%.

Saturated fat accounted for 37% in a dinner, leaving behind lunch at about 26% then 21% is present in snacks and breakfast contain least amount of it for 16%.

Added Sugar, 42% present in snacks make it most significant source of sugar, legging begind 23% in dinner while the proportion of sugar in lunch and breakfast was nticinly least respectively at 16% an 19%, which is almost twice as low compare with snacks.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the main contrasts: dinner has the highest shares of sodium and saturated fat, while snacks lead for added sugar; you also include several accurate figures. However, the overview contains a factual error: breakfast is not the lowest for every nutrient, since snacks have the same sodium share (14%) and breakfast has the lowest added-sugar share (16%). The final sentence also reverses the breakfast and lunch figures for added sugar: lunch is 19% and breakfast is 16%. The response is 135 words, below the 150-word minimum, which limits how fully you report and compare the data. To strengthen the summary, correct these details and develop the key comparisons more consistently.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure, with an overview followed by separate paragraphs on sodium, saturated fat and added sugar. This makes the information easy to locate, and phrases such as “followed by” and “in contrast” help signal comparisons. However, progression is sometimes weakened by unclear or awkward links: the overview’s “Dinner have the highest amount of sodium, saturated fat and snacks have highest added sugar” joins two points without a clear grammatical connection. The final comparison is also difficult to follow because the breakfast and lunch figures are presented in the wrong order. Use complete, parallel comparisons and check that each linking phrase accurately reflects the data; this would make cohesion less mechanical and more precise.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant chart vocabulary, including “accounted for,” “proportion,” “highest” and “followed by,” and the reader can generally understand the comparisons. However, some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “highest amount” for percentages, “leaving behind” for a lower figure, and “most significant source” when describing a share in a meal. Spelling errors in “legging begind” and “nticinly” also distract, while “Added Sugar” is unnecessarily capitalised mid-sentence. Aim for precise, conventional language such as “share,” “proportion” and “was followed by,” and proofread spelling and word forms. This would make the vocabulary more reliable and appropriate for describing numerical data.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more developed sentence forms, and several comparisons are understandable. However, some grammatical errors affect accuracy and fluency. In the overview, “Dinner have” and “breakfast have” show subject–verb agreement problems; “in contrast breakfast have least amount” also needs an article and clearer sentence structure. The fragment “Sodium presented 43% in dinner highest from all” lacks a suitable verb pattern, while “37% in a dinner” uses an unnecessary article. Punctuation and capitalisation are inconsistent, including the lowercase “in” after a full stop. Practise complete comparison sentences, agreement, and articles, then check each sentence for a clear subject and verb. Greater control would make your range of structures more effective.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.