Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-10-20

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The pie chart illustrate the average proportion in tupical meals of three types of mutrients , all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much .

In an overview dinner is the highest percentage in sodium , and snacks is the lowest percentage in sodium. However the highest percentage of dinner in saturated fat , and breakfast is the lowest proportion in saturated fat . Furthermore snacks is the highest percentage of added sugar , and breakfast is the lowest proportion in added sugar .

First and foremost in sodium breakfast is 14% , and 16% breakfast in saturated fat and sdded sugar . Additionaly 43% dinner in sodium and 37% in saturated fat as well as 23% in added sugar . Furthermore luch is 29% in sodium , and 26% in saturated fat and 19% in added sugar .

At least but not last snacks is 14% in sodium , and 21% in saturated fat . At the end of 42% snacks in added sugar .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You cover all three nutrients and all four meal types, and the figures you report match the chart. The overview identifies the main contrasts: dinner has the highest sodium and saturated-fat shares, while snacks lead in added sugar; breakfast is lowest for saturated fat and added sugar, and breakfast and snacks tie for the lowest sodium. This gives the response a clear account of the key features. To make the summary more complete, explicitly note that dinner is also the lowest for added sugar, and compare the meal patterns more directly rather than mainly listing figures. The overview is relevant, but some features are less fully developed than others, so sharper comparisons would strengthen it.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an opening, an overview and separate paragraphs for the figures. This helps the reader locate the main summary and the supporting details. However, progression within the detail paragraphs is limited: the figures are mostly presented as a list, and the final paragraph repeats the same reporting pattern rather than drawing comparisons. Linking phrases such as “First and foremost,” “Furthermore” and “At least but not last” are either mechanical or awkward, and some connections between clauses are unclear. Group the meals or nutrients according to meaningful contrasts, then use a small number of precise transitions and clear references to guide the reader through the data.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use relevant chart vocabulary, including “proportion,” “percentage,” “highest” and “lowest,” and the reader can generally understand the intended comparisons. However, the range is limited and several spelling and word-choice errors are noticeable, including “tupical,” “mutrients,” “sdded” and “luch.” Some expressions are also unnatural for describing data, such as “43% dinner in sodium” and “the highest percentage of dinner in saturated fat.” Use accurate terms such as “accounted for” or “made up,” and describe a nutrient’s share “in dinner” rather than saying a percentage is “of dinner.” More precise, varied phrasing would make the report clearer and more natural.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences joined with “and,” “however” and “as well as,” but the sentence patterns are repetitive and control is uneven. For example, “The pie chart illustrate” has a subject–verb agreement error, while “However the highest percentage of dinner in saturated fat” is a fragment rather than a complete sentence. Several data statements also omit the grammatical structure needed to express the relationship, as in “43% dinner in sodium.” Use complete clauses such as “Dinner accounted for 43% of sodium,” and check agreement, articles and punctuation. A wider range of accurately formed sentences would improve clarity.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.