Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-10-20

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The pie chart illustrates the average proportion of sodium, saturated fats and added sugar in typical meals consumed in the USA.

Overall, dinner is the major provider of major proivder of sodium and saturated fat, while snaks are leading source of added sugar. These figures highlight the importane of being cautions about the intake of these unhealthy nutrients, especially during diiner time.

For sodium, dinner accouts for the largest share 43%, followed by lunch at 29%. Breakfast and snacks each contribute at 14%. This showed that diiner is the main source of sodium in the Amercian meals.

Regarding saturated fat, dinner also take biggest portion at 37%, while makes up 26%. Breakfast stand at 16% and snacks were at 21%. This indicate simillar pattern, with dinner was main contributer.

In terms of added sugar, snacks are the top source, representing at 42, dinner follows with 23%. Lunch with 19% and breafast with 16%. This figure stands opposite direction, with snakcs are the main roots of added sugar in the USA.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.5

The response identifies the chart’s subject and gives a clear overview of its main contrasts: dinner has the highest shares of sodium and saturated fat, while snacks lead for added sugar. The figures reported for sodium and added sugar are accurate, and the saturated-fat figures are also correctly stated. This gives the account a well-supported focus on the most important features. To make the reporting more precise, complete the comparison in the saturated-fat sentence: “while makes up 26%” does not identify lunch as the category, and the overview’s advice about being cautious is an interpretation rather than a chart feature. Overall, the key information is covered and comparisons are relevant.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The organisation is clear and easy to follow: an introduction and overview are followed by separate paragraphs on sodium, saturated fat and added sugar. Signposting such as “For sodium,” “Regarding saturated fat” and “In terms of added sugar” helps readers track the comparisons. The progression from the largest share to the smaller figures is generally logical. Some linking and reference choices are less controlled, however. “This showed” shifts tense, while “This figure stands opposite direction” is an awkward way to connect the final comparison. The overview also repeats “major provider” and adds a conclusion-like comment about caution. More concise linking and clearer references would make the cohesion more flexible and less repetitive.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The response uses relevant chart vocabulary, including “average proportion,” “largest share,” “contribute” and “top source,” and it varies its wording when describing the categories. However, spelling errors are frequent and noticeable, including “proivder,” “snaks,” “importane,” “cautions,” “diiner,” “accouts,” “Amercian,” “simillar” and “breafast.” Several word choices or collocations are also inaccurate: “major provider” is repeated, “main roots” is unsuitable for describing a nutrient source, and “representing at 42” is not idiomatic. These issues make the vocabulary less precise and can slow the reader, despite the meaning usually remaining recoverable. Prioritise accurate spelling and natural chart-reporting phrases.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response attempts a mix of simple statements and longer comparisons, and most of the data can still be understood. However, errors in sentence structure and verb forms occur often enough to limit accuracy. For example, “dinner also take biggest portion” needs subject–verb agreement and an article; “while makes up 26%” is an incomplete clause; and “This indicate simillar pattern, with dinner was main contributer” combines incompatible structures. The final sentence, “with snakcs are the main roots,” has a similar clause problem. Some sentences also omit necessary grammatical links, as in “representing at 42.” Use complete clauses, check agreement and articles, and avoid joining “with” to a full subject-and-verb clause.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.