Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-10-21
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
The given pie graph illustrates the average proportions in standard foods of three classes of nutrients, perhaps these whole are harmful to our health if we take it a lot.
Overall, We have three pie charts which demonstrate the data of selected item; sodium, saturated fat and sugar. There are four types of typical meals such as breakfast which is shown by grey colour then dinner demonstrated by black moreover lunch is represented by check boxes and ultimately, snacks by white colour.
To begin with sodium, dinner has the highest concentration among them nonetheless snacks and breakfast contains the lowest percentage. Lunch stands on middle having 29%.
Subsequently,dinner also has the highest saturated fat proportion although breakfast has the lowest concentration comparetively to them. Lunch ranks on 2nd nevertheless snacks on third.
Ultimately,chart tells us that snacks has the largest sugar percentage in it and orderly dinner stands on second,lunch on third and breakfast at the end.
So,the chart usually gives us about the information of three ingredients in our routine meals. Their proportion can help us to prevent from over taking these nutrients and balanced them in our diet according to the diet plan.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You identify the main patterns accurately: dinner has the highest shares of sodium and saturated fat, while snacks lead for added sugar; you also give the correct lunch figures for sodium and the ranking of the other meals. This addresses the chart’s central comparisons. However, several claims would be clearer with exact figures, especially the saturated-fat and added-sugar comparisons, and the overview spends space describing chart colours rather than summarising the key contrasts. The final advice about preventing overconsumption is not required by the task and does not report chart data. To strengthen the response, give a concise overview of the contrasting peaks and include selected percentages to support the comparisons.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response has a recognisable sequence: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for sodium, saturated fat and sugar. This makes the information generally easy to follow, and the progression through the three nutrients is logical. You also use signposts such as “To begin with” and “Ultimately.” However, some linking is mechanical or awkward: “Subsequently” and “Ultimately” repeatedly announce the next chart rather than show a meaningful relationship, while “nonetheless” does not express a clear contrast in its sentence. The overview’s colour description interrupts the main comparison, and the concluding diet advice moves away from the report. Grouping the key similarities and differences more deliberately, with clearer references and fewer formulaic transitions, would improve cohesion.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You attempt a range of task-related vocabulary, including “proportions,” “concentration,” “ranks” and “percentage,” and the reader can usually understand the intended comparisons. However, several choices are inaccurate or unnatural for describing chart data: “selected item” should refer to the nutrients or categories, “check boxes” is not an appropriate description of a chart colour, and “take it a lot” does not naturally express excessive consumption. There are also awkward phrases such as “prevent from over taking” and “balanced them,” alongside repeated use of “highest” and “lowest.” Aim for precise, conventional collocations such as “accounted for,” “share,” and “consumed in excess,” and avoid describing visual details that are not important to the data.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You use both simple statements and some longer structures, for example the sentence beginning “Overall” and the contrast introduced by “although.” The main comparisons remain understandable, but errors in agreement, articles, sentence boundaries and punctuation are noticeable. Examples include “snacks and breakfast contains,” where the plural subject needs a plural verb, and “snacks has,” which also requires agreement. “There are four types of typical meals” is an awkward construction, while the final sentence combines several ideas without a clear grammatical structure. Capitalisation after commas and spacing after punctuation are inconsistent. Practise accurate subject–verb agreement and build longer sentences around one clear comparison, using full stops to separate additional points.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
