Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-11-02

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The three pie charts illustrate the average percentages of sodium,saturated fats and added sugars in four typical meals in the USA,which are breakfast,dinner ,lunch and snackes.

Overall,it is clear that dinner contains the highest amount of sodium and saturated fat,while snacks contain the most added sugar.In contrast ,breakfast contain the lowest percentage of all three nutrients.

For sodium,dinner accounts for 43%,followed by the lunch at 29%.Both breakfast and snacks make up only 14% each.A similar pattern observed in saturated fat,where dinner is again the highest at 37%.Lunch comes at second rank at about 26%,then snacks at 21%,and breakfast is the lowest at 16%.

In term of added sugar consumption,the trend is completely different.Snacks contain the highest amount at 42%,which is much more than any meal.Dinner contain 23% ,lunch contain 19% ,and finally breakfast contains the lowest percentage at 16%.This suggests that Americans consume unhealthy nutrients mostly during dinner and snacks.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.5

The response identifies the main contrasts accurately: dinner has the highest shares of sodium and saturated fat, while snacks lead for added sugar, and breakfast is lowest for all three. The figures reported are consistent with the charts, including the equal 14% shares for sodium in breakfast and snacks. The overview is clear, and the body groups the information by nutrient, supporting the comparisons with relevant data. The final claim that Americans consume unhealthy nutrients “mostly during dinner and snacks” is broader than the chart supports, since it describes percentages within meal categories rather than overall consumption habits. To strengthen the response further, keep conclusions tightly tied to the displayed proportions and make the comparisons across all three nutrients slightly more explicit.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The response has a clear progression: an introduction, an overview, and two body paragraphs that move from sodium and saturated fat to added sugar. Linking phrases such as “Overall,” “In contrast,” “followed by,” and “In term of” help signal the relationships between points, and the reader can follow the comparisons without difficulty. The organisation is effective, though some transitions are formulaic and the final sentence introduces a broad inference rather than extending the chart description. You could make cohesion more flexible by linking the nutrient patterns directly—for example, contrasting dinner’s leading shares in two categories with snacks’ dominance in added sugar—and by ensuring each concluding statement follows clearly from the data.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The vocabulary is adequate for describing the charts, with useful terms such as “accounts for,” “make up,” “highest amount,” and “percentage.” These allow the main figures and rankings to be communicated clearly. However, some choices are imprecise or awkward, including “comes at second rank,” “the trend is completely different,” and “consume unhealthy nutrients mostly.” There are also spelling and form errors such as “snackes,” which reduce accuracy. Aim for more precise chart language and natural collocations, such as “ranks second,” “the pattern differs for added sugar,” and “the largest proportion is recorded in snacks.” This would add flexibility and precision while keeping the description concise.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

The response uses a mix of simple statements and more complex structures, including the overview contrast with “while” and the clause beginning “where dinner is again the highest.” Meaning remains clear throughout. Some grammatical errors persist, however: “breakfast contain” and “Dinner contain” need subject–verb agreement, while “A similar pattern observed” is missing the verb “is.” The phrase “the lunch” also uses an unnecessary article, and punctuation spacing is inconsistent. These issues do not prevent understanding, but they limit accuracy. Review agreement with singular meal names, check that each sentence has a complete verb phrase, and proofread articles and punctuation. More consistently accurate complex sentences would improve control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.