Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-11-08

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Theres' been a debate about either people should accept the bad senarios like unsatisfactory job and shortage of money or they should try and improve such situations. Some people accept their fate because they fear about losing their current position, but I strongly believe that people should take attempts to improve their situation, as better output is only possible when we try.

On one hand, few people may try to keep their current situations as it is because it is safe for them. To overcome the unsatisfacoty environment one must take few steps keeping the consequences in mind. For example, if the job culture is not not good for us we should quit our job and rearch for new opportunities. But this decision comes with few uncertainity so people tends to avoid them. But in the long run it will be a problem for people both mentally and financially. Taking risks and making our way out of bad situations only possible when we stop accepting our current state of life.

On the other hand, trying to make our situation better in bad times is the only way out. Quality of life will come only after we do our best to overcome the difficulties of our life. From the story of Robert Bruce we learnt that failure is the pillar of succcess. There may be challanges in taking risks but the results will only be positive if we approach first. Everyone is equiped with different sets of skill and those will be helpful for making one's bad situations into strength. So, it is necessary for human being to keep pushing themselves for a better future.

In conclusion, even though accepting bad situations is a risk free approach, it will be of reason for great sufferings later. One should always search for better ways to crawl out their current bad state of life.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both views and state a clear opinion: the introduction supports trying to improve one’s circumstances, and the conclusion reinforces this position. The discussion of why people accept a bad situation—because it feels safe and change involves uncertainty—is relevant. You also give examples, including leaving an unsatisfactory job and the Robert Bruce story. However, the two sides are not developed equally: the reasons for accepting a situation receive limited explanation, while the argument for taking action relies on broad claims such as “the results will only be positive.” Explain more carefully when acceptance might be sensible and how people can improve their circumstances realistically. This would make the discussion more balanced and the supporting ideas clearer.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Signposts such as “On one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the discussion. The main progression is understandable, but cohesion is sometimes mechanical, particularly through repeated “But” and “So” openings. Some links between claims are also unclear: after suggesting that people may quit a job, “But in the long run it will be a problem” does not clearly identify what “it” refers to or explain the consequence. Use more precise referencing and connect examples directly to the point they support. This would make the argument flow more smoothly without relying so heavily on formulaic transitions.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use an adequate range of vocabulary for the topic, including “uncertain,” “consequences,” “overcome,” and “financially,” and the meaning is generally clear. There are also attempts at more expressive phrasing, such as “crawl out” of a bad situation, though this is not a natural fit for the formal essay. Several spelling errors—“senarios,” “unsatisfacoty,” “rearch,” and “succcess”—and inaccurate or awkward word choices reduce precision. Phrases such as “take attempts,” “better output,” and “failure is the pillar of success” are not idiomatic in this context. Aim for accurate collocations and check spelling carefully; this will help you express your ideas more naturally and precisely.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use a mix of simple and complex forms, including conditional clauses (“if the job culture is not…”) and a concessive opening in the conclusion (“even though…”). Most sentences remain understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. For example, “people tends to avoid them” has a subject–verb agreement error, while “Taking risks and making our way out of bad situations only possible” is missing a verb. The opening “Theres' been a debate about either people should…” also has an incorrect construction; use “There has been a debate about whether people should…”. Some sentences combine several ideas without clear grammatical links. Review agreement, complete sentence structure, and punctuation, while continuing to practise complex sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.