Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-11-09
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Student answer (Band 4.5)
Few individuals trust that it is best to accept a bad situation , Such as an unsatisfactory jobs and shortage of money . There are several reasons why this topic is important in our life . The main reason is that accepting a bad situation or trying to improve can have both possitive and negative effets on people and society . Many people face many difficulties in their daily lives , such as unsatisfactory jobs and shortage of money . Some people believe that it is better to accept bad situations , other think that people should try to improve them . Both views have their own advantages . But i personally believe that try to improve a bad situation in our life . Another important topic accepting a bad situation or try to improve can have both possitive and nagitive effects . It mainly depends on people how they use it and how they deal with this situation . Moreever , there are some possible ways to improve the situation . People should have proper knowledge and should make responsible decisions . The government , and society can have also play role by providing guidence and support . For instance , Simple rules and better awareness can help people make better choices . In my opinnion , people trying to improve their bad situations . For example , people job any company for work hard and received litter amount salary when they survived very challenging in society and creates much difficulties . So my opinnion , people change the jobs and accepting a bad situation and trying to improve their difficulties . By concluding , Accepting a bad situation or try to improve is an important issue that should not be ignored . If people and society work together That should reduced the negatives effets .
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 4.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 4.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 4.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5
You identify both positions and state a preference for improving difficult circumstances, so the response is relevant to the question. However, the discussion is only partial: the advantages of accepting a bad situation are not explained, and the reasons for your own view remain unclear. The example about someone working for a low salary is difficult to follow and does not clearly show how changing jobs would improve the situation. The comments about government guidance and awareness are also general rather than directly developed. To strengthen the response, explain one reason for each view, support each with a clear example, and state your opinion consistently. The response meets the required length; 13 words copied from the task prompt were not counted.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.0
There is an attempt to organise the response, with an opening, a paragraph beginning “Moreover,” and a concluding sentence. Basic links such as “For instance” and “By concluding” also signal examples and an ending. However, ideas do not progress clearly: the point that the issue has “both positive and negative effects” is repeated, while the two views are not separated into clearly developed sections. Some sentences are difficult to connect, particularly the example about a person’s job and salary, and the conclusion does not clearly follow from the discussion. Use one paragraph for each view, then a paragraph for your opinion, and make each paragraph develop one main point with clear references and transitions.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use some vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “unsatisfactory job,” “shortage of money,” “responsible decisions,” and “guidance and support.” These phrases show an attempt to discuss social and personal difficulties. However, the range is limited and several spelling and word-choice errors make parts of the response harder to understand, such as “possitive,” “effets,” “nagitive,” and “litter amount salary.” Some expressions are also unnatural or imprecise, including “people job any company” and “received litter amount salary.” Build a more accurate set of phrases for employment and financial hardship, and check spelling and collocations. More precise vocabulary would help communicate your examples without changing the basic ideas.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The response attempts both simple and longer sentence forms, for example, “People should have proper knowledge and should make responsible decisions,” and uses clauses introduced by “such as” and “when.” However, control is inconsistent, and errors in sentence structure and verb forms often make meaning unclear. For example, “people job any company for work hard and received litter amount salary” lacks a clear grammatical structure, while “people trying to improve their bad situations” is not a complete sentence in context. There are also problems with agreement and articles, as in “the government, and society can have also play role.” Practise forming complete sentences with a clear subject and verb, and check verb forms, plurals, articles, and punctuation.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.