Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-08-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is undeniable that every person have different option to choose their decision. In this regard, some people believe it is best to accept a bad condition such as an shortage of money and unsatisfactory job while some other think that it is endeavor to try and improve such situations. This essay will not outlined both views but also my opinion which is in favor of later point of view in forthcoming fragment with logical conclusion.

On the one hand, there are several advantage of acceptance of bad situations. In the prime one is that bad situations prepare for a future. there are apparent reason to justify this notion. The first and foremost is when a person suffer from some inferior circumstance they will become mentally strong for their future decision in critical situations. For example , money shortage and unsatisfactory job mainly test their patience. I see in hospitals people tolerate pain for survive they not have any other option because they not have goods for treatment at a time.

One the other hand, permanent relief only achieved by proper handling of problems. To clarify it, when a person try their best for good achieves they mentally take a peace because they have sufficient goods for future and for their family. Sample, Well businessmen have their own companies they work hard in beginning and prepare for future their companies give them well income without their presence.

In conclusion, although there are few advantage of accept a bad situations such as prepare for future but in my opinion other will cannot be neglected at any cost.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion5.5
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses both views and provides a clear personal opinion. However, the development of ideas is limited. The arguments provided, such as the hospital example or the businessman example, are somewhat vague and lack sufficient depth to fully support the points made. The introduction states that the essay will not outline both views, which contradicts the actual content and the task requirements. While the prompt is addressed, the lack of depth and the confusion in the introduction prevent a higher score. To improve, ensure that each body paragraph provides a clear, well-explained example that directly links back to the main argument.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into paragraphs, which is a positive feature. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate, such as 'In the prime one is that' or 'Sample, Well businessmen'. The progression of ideas is sometimes difficult to follow due to these awkward transitions and grammatical errors. While there is an overall attempt at a logical structure, the lack of sophisticated linking words and the repetitive nature of the sentence starters hinder the flow. Improving the variety and accuracy of transition signals would significantly enhance the coherence of the writing.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary is generally limited and repetitive. There are several instances of word-choice errors, such as 'endeavor to try' (redundant), 'good achieves' (incorrect collocation), and 'goods' used to mean 'resources' or 'financial stability'. The range of vocabulary is sufficient to communicate basic ideas, but it lacks the precision and flexibility required for higher bands. To improve, focus on learning collocations and using more precise terminology related to the topic, such as 'financial hardship' instead of 'shortage of money' or 'proactive approach' instead of 'proper handling'.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay contains frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. Examples include subject-verb agreement issues ('every person have', 'other will cannot be neglected'), missing articles ('in hospitals', 'for survive'), and awkward sentence structures ('they not have any other option'). While there is an attempt to use complex sentences, they are often marred by errors. The control over basic grammar is inconsistent. To improve, focus on mastering subject-verb agreement, correct article usage, and ensuring that sentence structures are grammatically sound before attempting more complex forms.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.