Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-08-20

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is widely believed that, an acceptance of any unfavorable circumstance is a great way to deal with the situation. For instance, unsatisfactory occupation or running out of money. However, others are of view that trying to enhance the condition can assist you in the long run; whereas, I am of the view that none of them solely can solve the issue. Everyone in this world has their own methods to tackle any crises with which they are comfortable. This essay will elucidate both arguments and it depends on the individual's choice.

A substantial number of citizens believe that if there is an unexpected circumstance or any imposed issue, the ideal is to accept it and do nothing about it. This way can lead us to no consequence and will be stuck in that issue for forever. A case in point is an involuntary profession that can result in; us being melancholic. As we are forced to perform a variety of tasks, this will not provide us prosperity in life. In a nutshell, we will face a shortage of money and we will be down in the dump.

Contrarily, a vast number of people argue that an exemplary way is to burn the midnight oil and to improve your condition. It can provide you a sense of security as you are not floccinaucinihilipilification regarding the circumstance. To illustrate, a person who is not satisfied about his employment, it is the best method to find a job that will provide him with peace of mind and profound happiness.

From my perspective, not only approval concerning some situations but also attempting to modify the condition is an excellent method of dealing with any issue. The first step to tackle a crisis is to accept it; however, a vast number of citizens are in denial. Then diligently figuring out an issue is best.

To conclude, both debates are fathomable and they can facilitate you in the best possible way to improve the problem.

The level of brain storming is required to handle the circumstance is dependent on a person's ability.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses both views and provides a personal opinion. However, the development of ideas is somewhat inconsistent. In the second paragraph, the argument for 'acceptance' is confusingly presented; the writer claims it is the 'ideal' but then immediately describes it as leading to 'no consequence' and being 'stuck'. This contradiction weakens the logical development of the first viewpoint. The conclusion is also slightly vague, suggesting a middle ground without clearly explaining how the two approaches integrate. While all parts of the prompt are addressed, the depth of analysis is limited by these logical inconsistencies.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, and there is a clear attempt to use cohesive devices such as 'However', 'Contrarily', and 'To illustrate'. However, the use of these devices is sometimes mechanical or slightly unnatural. For instance, the transition 'In a nutshell' is used to summarize a negative point, which is an incorrect usage of the idiom. Additionally, some sentences are disjointed, such as the final sentence of the essay, which lacks a clear connection to the preceding argument. Paragraphing is present, but the flow of ideas within paragraphs could be smoother.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary range is adequate but shows a mix of strengths and weaknesses. The student attempts to use sophisticated vocabulary, such as 'floccinaucinihilipilification', but this is used incorrectly in context and feels forced. Other phrases like 'down in the dump' (should be 'dumps') and 'unsatisfactory occupation' are understandable but slightly awkward. There are also minor errors in word choice, such as 'approval concerning' instead of 'acceptance of'. While the student demonstrates an attempt to use a wider range of vocabulary, the lack of precision and occasional misuse of idioms limit the score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. However, there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. Examples include punctuation errors, such as the unnecessary comma after 'believed that,' and sentence fragments like 'For instance, unsatisfactory occupation or running out of money.' There are also issues with subject-verb agreement and preposition usage, such as 'stuck in that issue for forever' and 'not satisfied about his employment.' While the meaning is generally clear, the frequency of these errors prevents the writing from reaching a higher band.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.