Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-09-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

While some believe that accepting bad situations, such as poor financial status, is the best approach to deal with life challenges, some others advocate for fighting for better life conditions. This essay will explore both perspectives before presenting a personal viewpoint that seeking solutions should be the primary approach.

On the one hand, proponents of adapting with tough conditions by embracing them often argue that such an approach is the most effective in dealing with life challenges, since it instills a sense of satisfaction and acceptance of a reality that in many cases might be unchangable. For instance, a mother who gives birth to a child with major birth defects might prefer to accept her child's fate intead of chasing an unrealistic hope, specially that majority of the congenital issues are uncurable and siginificantly decrease life expectancy.

On the other hand, many others argue that fighting for better life conditions is a fundemental value that does not only reflect positively on the individual's life, but also benefit the society as whole. Since the citizens are the building unit of the soicety, personal improvement is the first step towards societal progress. Moreover, hundreds or maybe thousands of stories for people who lived in an extremely harsh situations such as poverty or a persisitng sickness who eventually overcame these challenges and became notibaly successful, these stories should be an inspiration for current and future generation who will be the cornerstone of tommorow's success.

In conclusion, although acceptence might be beneficial in certain conditions where being hopeful is unrealistic, attempting to improve one's situation and superpass challenges is an extremely pivotal trait to be instilled in our societies in order to shape individuals and socities alike.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response7.0
Coherence and Cohesion7.0
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.0

The response effectively addresses all parts of the task by discussing both views on how to handle bad situations—whether to accept them or to try and improve them—and clearly provides a personal viewpoint in the introduction and conclusion. The ideas are relevant and generally well-developed. For instance, the example of a mother accepting a child with major birth defects effectively supports the view on acceptance, while the arguments regarding societal progress support the view on fighting for improvement. Although some ideas, such as the discussion on societal building blocks, could be extended further, the position remains clear throughout, meeting the criteria for a solid Band 7 performance under Task Achievement.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.0

The essay displays a clear logical organisation and progression throughout. Each paragraph has a distinct focus, moving smoothly from the introduction to the exploration of both perspectives and finishing with a cohesive conclusion. Cohesive devices are used reasonably well, such as 'On the one hand', 'On the other hand', and 'In conclusion', which help to guide the reader through the text. Paragraphing is used appropriately and supports the overall structure of the essay. While referencing and transitions are generally clear, occasional slight clunkiness prevents the response from reaching the higher bands, placing it comfortably at Band 7.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The student demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision, such as 'proponents', 'congenital issues', 'life expectancy', and 'pivotal trait'. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, though this is occasionally marred by spelling and word-choice errors, such as 'unchangable' (unchangeable), 'intead' (instead), 'specially' (especially), 'uncurable' (incurable), 'siginificantly' (significantly), 'fundemental' (fundamental), 'soicety' (society), 'notibaly' (notably), 'persisitng' (persisting), 'acceptence' (acceptance), and 'superpass' (surpass). Because these errors do not impede communication and an adequate range is shown, the lexical resource fits the Band 6 descriptor.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The writer uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, demonstrating an ability to construct multi-clause sentences, such as 'While some believe that accepting bad situations... this essay will explore both perspectives...'. However, there are several grammatical and mechanical inaccuracies throughout the text, including punctuation errors (such as a comma splice in the third paragraph: '...became notibaly successful, these stories should be...'), prepositional slips ('adapting with tough conditions' instead of 'adapting to'), and spelling issues noted previously. Despite these errors, they rarely impede communication, and the grammatical control is sufficient to warrant a Band 6.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.