Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-09-15
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
From the general populace, some individuals state that acceptance of bad situations is a beneficial aspect and these circumstances might be related to unsatisfied job and a little money. At the same time, others rejecting this notion with the help of suitable reasons and they claim that, people should struggle for the reactification of bad circumstances. In my imagination, second proposition appears to be more rational and logical and I shall elaborate it with the help of suitable perspectives and also draw a useful conclusion for it.
On the one hand, some individuals argue that people should develop a habit of acceptance of everyting which they feel unsuitable in their lives. These might be hurdles of jobs satisfaction and money. Likewise, they state that, people should spend time in these hardships because if they attempt to reduce them, these problems may enhance to a considerable extent.
On the other hand, others claim that; individulas should work for sorting out these miserable conditions. Moreover, they have deep believe in human senses, due to the fact that they advice them to find out beneficial solutions of unusual circumstances by using human capabilities and characteristics. From my perspective, it is not an unappropriate notion to sorting out the problems in which people are entangled. Everyone has an authority and rights to tweak the unpleasant and stressful situations from their lives.
To put it briefly, although different individuals confront the circumstances which are unfavourable for them, but it's not mean that people should not struggle to cope up with these sorrowful experiences. They may make their lives more smooth and happy by eradicating these unuseful events from their lives with the help of strategic plans.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0
The response addresses all parts of the task by discussing both views—that of accepting bad situations and that of trying to improve them—and provides a clear personal opinion. The position is maintained throughout the essay. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited and repetitive. For instance, the discussion on acceptance suggests that problems 'may enhance to a considerable extent,' but this idea is not fully supported with deep examples or elaboration. Similarly, the counter-argument touches upon human capabilities but lacks concrete illustrations. While the main requirements are met, the reasoning tends to be generalised and briefly stated rather than deeply extended, placing this performance at a Band 6.0.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0
The essay is arranged coherently with a clear overall progression. The writer uses standard transitional markers to guide the reader, such as 'On the one hand,' 'On the other hand,' and 'To put it briefly.' Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. However, cohesion at the sentence level is occasionally faulty or mechanical, as seen in phrases like 'At the same time, others rejecting this notion' where verb forms disrupt flow. Referencing is generally clear, but some awkward transitions and slightly unnatural logical links prevent the essay from achieving a higher band, making Band 6.0 an appropriate evaluation for cohesion and coherence.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The student demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting less common lexical items such as 'populace,' 'proposition,' 'rational,' and 'eradicating.' However, there are notable word choice, collocation, and spelling errors throughout the text, such as 'reactification' instead of 'rectification,' 'everyting' instead of 'everything,' 'unappropriate' instead of 'inappropriate,' and 'unuseful' instead of 'useless' or 'unhelpful.' Phrases like 'little money' and 'jobs satisfaction' also show unnatural collocation. Because these lexical errors occur frequently and occasionally cause slight strain for the reader, the lexical resource fits comfortably within the Band 5.5 descriptor range.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating some variety in structure with dependent clauses and conditional elements. Nevertheless, there are frequent grammatical errors and awkward phrasing that impact accuracy. Examples include 'some individuals state that acceptance of bad situations is a beneficial aspect and these circumstances might be related to unsatisfied job,' 'others rejecting this notion with the help of suitable reasons,' and 'it's not mean that people should not struggle to cope up with.' Subject-verb agreement, article usage, and prepositional choices show persistent inaccuracies. Since errors are frequent and occasionally impede smooth understanding, a Band 5.0 is awarded for grammar.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.