Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-09-27
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
A handful of masses consider that the acceptance of poor conditions like dissatifying duties and lack of money should be better whilst, opponents reckon that they must apply for better and high salaried jobs to improve their conditions. As far as i am concerned, individuals ought to make an effort to improve their conditions instead of lying on the same jobs and i am going to discuss both the views with reasons in the forthcoming paragraphs.
Commencing with the viewpoints that people should stay on the job they are doing even if they are not contended, the first and foremost factor is that public these days is facing lack of vanacies. In other words, due to shortage of opportunities in the market for employment, individuals are confronting challanges to make their ends meet by performing the same jobs for long time and there is no doubt that they have no any other option. Another underlying key factor is poverty. To explicate this, under the poverty line, pulic is compelled to be on the vancancies even if they are not fulfilling their demands and are just a wastage of energy just owing to lack of knowledge and want to stuck over there. Thus, persons are satisfied whatever they have and performing in their daily lives.
Moving towards seeking better opportunities instead of staying in same situations that are not fulfilling daily needs. The prominent cause is they are young and educated then can opt other options. To illustrate this, people should utilize their knowledge to find out the opportunities those can make them feel enthusiastic and contended in their lives as well as they can save the amount for future necessities. Apart from that, happiness of mind will be at another level. To explain this, if an individual works with delighted mind and satisfied with the work as well as return home with smiling face this can be much better than anything else not only for a person itself but also for whole family.
To recapitulate, although folks because of less oppotunities and unwillingness are performing the same jobs however, i believe that they must attempt once or twice at least to search new work for their progress and make ends meet.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
The response addresses all parts of the prompt by discussing both views on accepting bad situations versus trying to improve them, and presents a clear personal position throughout the essay. The ideas are generally relevant and extended, such as discussing job market scarcity and the mental health benefits of finding better work. However, some arguments lack full development and tend to over-generalise, such as the claim that people stuck in poverty are simply compelled to stay due to lack of knowledge. Overall, the task is addressed adequately, fitting the profile of a Band 6.0.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with a clear introduction, body paragraphs addressing each viewpoint, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is used sufficiently to structure the text. However, cohesive devices are sometimes mechanical or faulty, such as the transitional phrase 'Commencing with the viewpoints that...' which feels slightly unnatural. Additionally, referencing is occasionally unclear, as seen with pronouns like 'they' and 'them' having ambiguous antecedents in the second body paragraph. Progression is present, but logical links could be smoother, aligning the performance with Band 6.0 descriptors.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
The student demonstrates an adequate vocabulary range for the task, attempting less common items such as 'contended', 'underlying key factor', and 'recapitulate'. However, there are noticeable spelling and word-choice errors throughout the text, including 'dissatifying' instead of 'dissatisfying', 'vanacies' and 'vancancies' instead of 'vacancies', and 'challanges' instead of 'challenges'. The phrase 'want to stuck over there' exhibits awkward collocation and grammatical slippage. Because these errors occur with some frequency but do not impede overall communication, the lexical resource is best placed at Band 5.5.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, utilizing relative clauses and conditional structures. However, grammatical accuracy is inconsistent. There are frequent errors in punctuation and sentence structure, such as comma splices and missing articles (e.g., 'As far as i am concerned', 'absence of opportunities in market'). Run-on sentences and awkward phrasing like 'people should utilize their knowledge to find out the opportunities those can make them feel' detract from fluency. While meaning is usually preserved, errors cause some difficulty for the reader, fitting the Band 5.0 criteria.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.