Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-10-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

 

Student answer (Band 5.0)

It is undeniable that it is best to accept a circumstances, such as unsatisfactory job or lack of money. In this regards, if a person try to improve such situations will be more benficial for them. This essay will not only outlined the merits of accepting such situations but also the advantages of trying better to improving such situations in the upcoming paragraphs with a logical conclusion.

To commence with, accepting unfavourable situations can sometimes be a sensible decisions. The prime one is that in many situations, people have limited resources and opportunities, which may have difficulties and risk. To clarify it, people struggling with a financial conditions may wants to have a stable job rather than a risk to have a better positions. Similiarly, if a person accept such situations may dont have to face any mental health conditions like stress or anxiety. Nowdays people are having stress because of the lack of employment or financial conditions.

However, many people belive that actively improving such situations is essential for personal growth and long term success. To elaborate it, if a individuals try to improve such situations can acess new skills which will help to get a satisfactory job. Moreover, not accepting such situations can give confident to work more hard to set a financial strong life.

In my perspective, it is better to accept such situations to reliaf

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You address both views: the first body paragraph explains why accepting difficult circumstances may reduce risk and stress, while the next presents personal growth and improved employment prospects as reasons to make changes. However, the response only partially fulfils the task. Your own opinion is not clearly completed: the introduction says improvement is more beneficial, but the final sentence begins, “In my perspective, it is better to accept such situations to reliaf” and then stops, leaving your position and conclusion unclear. The supporting ideas are also brief and general, with little explanation or example. The response is 21 words below the required minimum, which limits the space available to develop both sides and state your view fully. Complete the conclusion and extend the explanations with specific examples.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and an attempted conclusion. Linking expressions such as “To commence with,” “However,” and “Moreover” help signal the direction of the discussion. However, progression is limited: the introduction promises a “logical conclusion,” but the final sentence is unfinished, so the essay does not reach a clear ending. Some connections between ideas are also awkward or unclear, particularly “In this regards” and “To elaborate it.” The first body paragraph moves from limited opportunities to financial stability and then stress without fully explaining how these points relate. Use clearer transitions and develop each paragraph around one main idea, explaining its connection to the task.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “unfavourable situations,” “limited resources and opportunities,” “personal growth,” and “financial conditions.” These choices show an attempt to discuss the issue beyond very basic terms. However, the range is limited and several word-choice, collocation, word-form, and spelling errors make the writing less natural. Examples include “a financial conditions,” “a satisfactory job,” “financial strong life,” and misspellings such as “benficial,” “Similiarly,” and “belive.” Some phrases, including “trying better to improving,” are difficult to interpret. Build a more accurate set of topic collocations and check spelling and word forms carefully; this will make your ideas easier to follow.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a conditional structure in “if a person try to improve such situations” and a contrastive opening with “However.” Nevertheless, complex attempts are often faulty, and frequent errors affect clarity. For example, “if a person try” has incorrect subject–verb agreement, while “people … may wants” combines a modal with an incorrectly inflected verb. Articles and plurals are also inconsistent, as in “accept a circumstances” and “a better positions.” The final sentence is incomplete, and the opening sentence does not form a clear grammatical relationship between its two claims. Practise accurate conditional clauses, modal verb patterns, and complete sentence construction before adding more complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.