Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-11-05
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
Every person often face challenges such as an unsatisfactory job or financial shortages in their life. While some argues that it's the best option to accept a bad situations and stay calm with their situation and others argue that it's better to try new ways of opportunity and they have to at least try to improve their situations.
On the one hand, Some people believes that this is the most practical approach to accept bad situation. For instance, if they try any new field or change jobs that could be risky and uncertain or they could be unsuccessful in that field. Furthermore, attempting to improve their financial situation or new path in career can be time consuming and stressful as well which some people might find frustrated. Likewise, Some individuals who finds stability more peaceful and wish to avoid risks, acceptance might seem like most rational choice.
on the other hand, Some are argues that it's good way to face challenges and try new things and improves their situation rather then accept the stable situation. Like, people who choose challenges for better life leads to personal growth. For instance, many people with their unsatisfactory jobs may choose to upgrade confidence or persue higher qualification in order to qualify for better situation. This preventive approach not only increasing chances of better situation or achieving more fulfilling career but also upgrade their skills. Furthermore, people who works towards their circumstances and trying to improve their situations are more likely to satisfies in their lives.
In my opinion, Acceptance could be temporary approach in some cases. As my point of view try and improve new things are far better then accept bad situation. There may be risks in new ways, but people can open new doors and enhance their skills as well.
In conclusion, While accepting a financial or any type of bad condition could be give you temporary comfort & security. But by facing challenges give more confidence and leads to achieve personal growth.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You address both views and give a clear preference for trying to improve difficult circumstances, especially in “In my opinion” and the conclusion. The discussion of acceptance is relevant: you explain that changing jobs may be risky and that pursuing change can be stressful. You also support improvement with examples such as gaining qualifications and developing skills. However, some points are asserted rather than fully explained. For example, “people who works towards their circumstances” are said to be more satisfied, but the reason for this is not developed. The idea of acceptance as a temporary approach is also introduced late and could be connected more clearly to the two views. Develop each main claim with a clearer explanation or specific example to make the response more complete and persuasive.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response has a coherent overall arrangement: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, your opinion, and a conclusion. This makes the main progression easy to follow, and signposts such as “On the one hand,” “on the other hand,” and “In conclusion” help orient the reader. There is also some effective linking within paragraphs, for example “Furthermore” and “Likewise.” To make the organisation more flexible and precise, avoid relying on formulaic transitions and ensure each paragraph develops one central point. The opinion paragraph repeats the preference already stated in the introduction rather than extending it, while the conclusion introduces a contrast that could be expressed more clearly. Check references such as “their situation” so it is always clear whose circumstances are meant.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use a relevant range of vocabulary for the topic, including “risky,” “uncertain,” “stability,” “personal growth,” and “higher qualification.” These choices help communicate both the risks of change and its potential benefits. There are also attempts at less common expressions, but several are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “new ways of opportunity,” “upgrade confidence,” and “preventive approach.” Repetition of “situation” and “improve” also limits flexibility. Choose collocations that express the intended meaning directly, and check word forms and spelling: “persue” should be “pursue,” while “satisfies” does not fit the intended meaning. More precise alternatives and less repetition would make the argument clearer and more natural.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including conditional structures such as “if they try any new field or change jobs…” and a relative clause beginning “which some people might find…”. These attempts show some range, and the overall meaning is generally recoverable. However, errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence construction recur. For example, “Every person often face” needs subject–verb agreement, and “Some people believes” has the same issue. In “people who works,” the verb should agree with the plural subject; “this preventive approach not only increasing” also needs a correctly formed verb. Review sentence boundaries and punctuation, particularly the comma after introductory phrases and the capitalisation of “Some” mid-sentence. More accurate control of these patterns would improve readability.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.