Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The given bar chart illustrates and compare value of export earnings in petroleum product , engineer goods, gems and jewellery , agricultural products and textile from 2015 to 2016 and the table demonstrates the proportion of change in export of each category .

overall , it is evident that in both years petroleum products was maximum export while, textiles was minimum export . Furthermore, textile was the highest proportion whereas, agricultural product was the least percentage .

After analzing the bar chart petroleum product was the highest export earning 60 billion dollar and almost 62 billion dollar respectively in 2015 and 2016 which was the highest among all five cateogries . Moreover, engineer good export about 50 billion dollar and approximately 61 billion dollar in 2016 . Addiotionally, agricultural products export almost same 30 billion dollar in both years. In addition to this , textile was the lowest export earnings nearly 24 billion dollar in 2015 and 31 billion dollar in 2016.

With regards to the percentage change in products from in the given period textiles account for 15. 24% and agriculture was the least percentage 0.81% . Following this, enginnered goods represent about 8.5% and petroleulm products 3% through out the given period.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the main overall patterns: petroleum products are the largest export category, textiles show the strongest percentage growth, and agricultural products change least. You also include several relevant figures, such as petroleum at about $60 billion and $62 billion and textiles rising to roughly $31 billion. However, some comparisons are incomplete or inaccurate: textiles were not the lowest category in 2016, when they were approximately level with agricultural products, and gems and jewellery—an important category—are not discussed in the body. The overview’s claim that textiles were the minimum export applies only to 2015, so it needs qualification. Reporting the decline in gems and jewellery and comparing the categories more precisely would make the summary more complete and clear.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, an overview, a paragraph on export values, and a final paragraph on percentage changes. This gives the reader a coherent route through the information, and linking expressions such as “Moreover” and “In addition” help connect details. The progression is not fully smooth, however. The final paragraph lists percentage changes without explaining that gems and jewellery fell, while the earlier paragraph omits that category altogether. Some transitions, including “After analyzing” and “With regards to,” feel formulaic, and punctuation spacing sometimes interrupts the flow. To strengthen progression, group the main increases together, contrast them with the decline, and use references that clearly connect each figure to its category.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use a reasonable range of task-related vocabulary, including “export earnings,” “percentage change,” “highest,” and “approximately,” so the main information is generally understandable. There are also attempts at more formal reporting language, such as “account for” and “represent.” However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or awkward: “proportion of change” is less suitable than “percentage change,” and “engineer goods” should be “engineered goods.” Spelling errors such as “analzing,” “cateogries,” “Addiotionally,” and “petroleulm” reduce accuracy. Some repetition of “export” and “products” also limits flexibility. Check category names carefully and use precise verbs such as “rose,” “fell,” and “remained stable” to describe the data.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a contrast in the overview and sentences beginning “Moreover” and “With regards to.” The meaning is usually recoverable, but some grammatical errors remain. For example, “petroleum products was” has subject–verb disagreement, while “the highest export earning 60 billion dollar” lacks a clear verb and has problems with number and articles. The opening sentence also needs a more accurate structure: “illustrates and compare value” should use parallel verb forms and an article before “value.” Commas are sometimes placed awkwardly, and spacing before punctuation is inconsistent. Aim for complete, controlled sentences, check singular and plural agreement, and use past-tense reporting consistently when describing the two years.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.