Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-10-04

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The given bar graph illustrates the export earning of various categories such as petroleum products, engineered goods, gems and jewellery, agricultural products and textiles in 2015 and 2016. The given table compares the percentage of both years in terms of every export group.

Overall, it is clear that Petrolum products and engineered goods significantly increased over the period, whereas textiles and agricultral product remained at lower level. Additionally, textiles percentage recorded high in 2016 as compared to others.

To commence with bar graph, in 2015 the petroulum products and engineered product earning were 60% and less tha 60% respectively , both showed slight rise in 2016 and made up 62%. Subsequently, the profit from gems and jewellery was about more than 40% but it slightly declined in 2016 and accounted for 40%. Agricultral products remained almost equal in couple of year. Textile climbed markedly in 2016 from 25% to 31%.

Turning towards table, textile percentage considerably rose in 2015-16 figured 15.24%, followed by engineered product(8.5%), pertrolum products(3%) and agricultural products(0.81). Except gems and jewellery which dropped by 5.18%.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses all parts of the task by reporting the main features from both the bar graph and the table, selecting relevant data such as the top export earners and the percentage changes. However, some parts are developed more fully than others, and there are occasional misunderstandings or inaccurate readings of the visual data, such as misinterpreting the units as percentages (e.g., writing '60% and less tha 60%' instead of billions of dollars). Furthermore, some details lack precision and clarity, which prevents the response from achieving a higher band. To reach the next level, you should ensure data is interpreted accurately according to the chart's actual units and provide a more fully developed comparison across all categories.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response demonstrates a coherent overall arrangement with a clear introduction, an overview paragraph, and separate body paragraphs addressing the graph and table respectively. Logical sequencing is present, and basic paragraphing is used. However, cohesion at times feels mechanical or slightly faulty, with referencing that is not always entirely clear, such as abrupt transitions like 'To commence with bar graph' and awkward phrasing connecting the sentences. To bridge the gap to the next band, you need to use cohesive devices more flexibly and ensure that transitions between ideas and paragraphs flow smoothly without feeling formulaic or disjointed.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

An adequate range of vocabulary is used for the task, with attempts to incorporate less common terms like 'significantly increased', 'considerably rose', and 'declined'. However, there are noticeable spelling errors (such as 'Petrolum', 'agricultral', 'petroulum', 'Agricultral') and some awkward word choices that do not impede communication but reveal limitations in lexical precision and control. To move higher, you should expand your control of less common vocabulary and pay closer attention to spelling and accurate word forms, ensuring terms like 'petroleum' and 'agricultural' are spelled correctly throughout.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response employs a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating some control over sentence structure. There are, nevertheless, several errors in grammar and punctuation, including missing articles, prepositions, and awkward clause structures, such as 'earning were 60% and less tha 60% respectively' and 'in couple of year'. While these errors rarely impede overall communication, they do persist and prevent the grammar from being fully controlled. To achieve a higher band, you should aim for greater accuracy in complex grammatical structures, subject-verb agreement, and preposition usage while reducing the frequency of basic mechanical errors.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.