Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-10-06

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The graph illustrates different types of exports of a state through 2015 and 2016.

Overall, it is clear that petroleum products and engineering things have the largest portion in the graph. Generally, textile industry has dramatic rise in 2016 as compared to 2015.

First, petrol, diesel , kerosine oil and all kind of petroleum products have a minor climb of three percent in 2016 as compared to 2015. Following this, all types of engineering equipment and goods marginally goes up. Engineering goods rise significantly 8.5% in 2016 greater than 2015. Considerably, exports of petroleum products was lesser than engineering goods. Gems and jewellery items holds the middle portion of graph. It drops 5.18% dramatically in 2016. It was noticeably less in 2016 as equated to 2015.

Agricultural department almost as same as in both years and do not play a significant role in 2015 and 2016. Agricultural products remain constant but a slightly rise of 0.81% in 2016. The textile industries play the most dramatical role in exports of country. Rapidly, within a year it goes up almost triple as compared to rest of industries. Textiles top the graph and climb 15.24% in 2016.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the main pattern that petroleum and engineered goods were the highest-value categories, and you note the contrasting movements in textiles and gems and jewellery. Most reported percentage changes match the table. However, the overview is not fully accurate: textiles did not “top the graph”; petroleum products remained the largest category in both years, followed by engineered goods. The claim that textiles rose “almost triple” is also misleading: their value increased from about $26 billion to $31.5 billion, rather than tripling. Some comparisons are unclear or underdeveloped, particularly the relative values of the leading categories. A more precise overview and accurate comparison of the chart’s dollar values would make the key features clearer.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, an overview and paragraphs covering the categories. Sequencing expressions such as “First,” “Following this” and “Overall” help guide the reader, and the discussion generally moves through the chart in a sensible order. However, some links feel mechanical, and the paragraph about petroleum and engineering repeats information without clearly comparing their values. References such as “It” in “It drops 5.18%” are understandable but could be more precise. Grouping the categories by trend—for example, increases versus the decline in gems and jewellery—could create a clearer progression. Use linking phrases selectively and make each paragraph’s focus explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a reasonable range of topic-related vocabulary, including “exports,” “percentage,” “dramatic rise” and “remain constant,” so the main subject is generally clear. There are also attempts to vary wording, but several choices are inaccurate or unnatural for describing data. “Engineering things,” “petrol, diesel, kerosine oil” and “agricultural department” are imprecise, while “dramatical” is not the correct form. Phrases such as “middle portion of graph” and “top the graph” do not describe category values naturally. Aim for precise chart language and avoid adding product examples that are not shown. More accurate collocations would improve clarity and control.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, and most of the message remains understandable. However, some errors in agreement, tense and sentence construction are noticeable. For example, “Engineering goods rise significantly” should use a past-tense form to match the years being compared, and “Agricultural products remain constant but a slightly rise” has an incorrect verb pattern. In “petroleum products was lesser,” the plural subject does not agree with “was.” There are also punctuation and spacing issues, such as the space before the comma in “diesel ,”. Check subject–verb agreement and keep past-tense reporting consistent; these corrections would make the comparisons more accurate and fluent.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.