Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-10-09

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The chart compares the amount of exports of five different products of a country in 2015 and 2016 while table shows the percentage change in these categories over the two year period.

Overall, all products foreign revenue increased except gems and jewellery. petroleum products generated more money and textiles contributed least. Similarly, all products sales experiencec a rise, gems and jewellery went through a decline.

In 2015, pertoleum exports generated just over 60 billion in sales which rose to about 62 billion in 2016. Engineered goods at the second place contributed to approximately 58 billion revenue, that figure significantly increase to over 60 billion in 2016. Gems and jewellery accounted for about 42 billion foreign earnings which reduced to almost 40 billion in 2016. Money earned through agricultural goods was identical in both years between 30 to 32 billions. At the last, textiles had the lowest sales in 2015 to about 25 billion which levelled with agricultural exports of 2016.

In terms of sales, texiles had the highest boost of 15.24%, followed by 8.5% in engineered goods and 3% in petroleum goods. The percent change increase in agricultural goods was smallest of 0.81% and gems and jewellery proportion fell by 5.18%.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.5

The response selects the main trends and supports them with relevant figures: petroleum products remain the largest export, textiles show the strongest growth, and gems and jewellery decline. The comparisons between 2015 and 2016 are generally accurate, including the approximate values and all percentage changes. The overview is clear, although it contains a contradiction: it says textiles “contributed least,” which is true for 2015 but not 2016, when textiles and agricultural products are approximately level. The claim that “all products sales” rose also conflicts with the decline in gems and jewellery. Clarifying that four categories increased while one fell, and specifying that textiles were lowest in 2015, would make the summary more precise and consistently developed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The response has a clear overall progression: an introduction, an overview, a paragraph comparing export values, and a final paragraph reporting percentage changes. This organisation makes the information easy to follow, and phrases such as “In 2015” and “In terms of sales” help signal shifts in focus. However, the overview’s two statements about increases are inconsistent, briefly disrupting the logical flow. Some linking and reference choices are also less natural, such as “At the last” and “that figure,” whose referent could be made more explicit. Use concise transitions and ensure each paragraph’s claims align; this would make the cohesion more flexible and polished.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

There is an adequate range of task-related vocabulary, including “generated,” “accounted for,” “decline,” “contributed,” and “percentage change.” These choices allow the writer to describe values and trends, and the meaning is generally clear. However, some collocations and word forms are inaccurate or awkward, such as “amount of exports,” “foreign revenue,” “highest boost,” and “the percent change increase.” There are also spelling errors, including “pertoleum,” “experiencec,” and “texiles.” These do not prevent understanding, but they limit precision and control. Prefer standard chart language such as “export earnings,” “recorded the largest increase,” and “the percentage change,” and proofread category names carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

The response uses a mix of simple and more complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “which rose to about 62 billion” and comparisons across years. Most sentences communicate the intended figures clearly. Some grammatical errors remain, however: the introduction needs an article in “while the table shows”; “all products sales experiencec a rise” has an incorrect verb form and agreement; and “that figure significantly increase” uses the wrong tense. There are also issues with articles and number forms in phrases such as “at the second place” and “30 to 32 billions.” Review past-tense consistency when describing completed years, subject–verb agreement, and singular/plural forms to improve accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.