Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In this contemporary world, it is irrefutable that, a small number of individuals believe that the core problem of ecosystem is decline animal populations and plants, others state that there are several types of problems of the natural plants. Prior to my stance, both viewpoints would be discussed in the following paragraphs with valid reasons and appropriate examples.

Discussing the former view, supporters believe that, the plants are becoming increasingly worse throughout the period. The group of plants and animals become extinct due to deforestation and excessive tree cutting , which can detrimentally affects natural habitants. Another significant reason is that, predator animals prey on several types of animals and they can also affect plants indirectly. For instance, During drought plants dry up and animals lose food and water and some die.

However, proponents have their own opinions. To begin with, the plant pollution has become steadily wide spread over the time periods due to air, water and noise pollution. Excessive use of heavy vehicle is are associated with harmful emission gases which can negatively affect ecosystem. Besides, traffic congestion leads to noise pollution. For instance, whenever there is exacerbate use of commercial vehicles, it can lead to air pollution and noise pollution.

In conclusion, although, both perspective have their own merits, i believe that latter view point is more convincing ,mainly because extreme use of old vehicles results several types of pollution, so their use should be reduced.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You attempt to discuss both views and state a preference for the second, pollution-focused view. However, the response only partially fulfils the task: the first view is described mainly as declining plant and animal populations, while the second is narrowed to pollution, without clearly comparing which environmental problems are more important. Several points are unclear or weakly supported; for example, the predator example does not explain how predation makes species loss the main environmental problem, and the drought example is not developed. The conclusion gives a reason for your opinion, but the position is not fully established through the essay. The response is also 11 words below the required minimum, so it needs further relevant development as well as a clearer comparison.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a conclusion. Phrases such as “Discussing the former view,” “However,” and “In conclusion” help signal the stages of the argument. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow because ideas are listed without clear explanation of how they support the main point. The sentence about predators, for instance, shifts from animal populations to plants without making the connection clear. Some linking is mechanical or repetitive, particularly the repeated use of “For instance” and “To begin with.” Improve cohesion by making each paragraph’s central claim explicit and using pronouns and transitions that clearly connect evidence to that claim.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt some topic-related vocabulary, including “deforestation,” “predator animals,” “traffic congestion,” and “noise pollution,” and these choices show awareness of the environmental theme. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate or unclear, which sometimes makes the meaning difficult to follow. Examples include “the plant pollution,” “natural habitants,” “exacerbate use,” and “the core problem of ecosystem.” There is also repetition of “pollution” and “plants and animals” without much paraphrasing. Aim for precise environmental terms and natural collocations, such as “habitat loss,” “vehicle emissions,” and “biodiversity decline.” Check spelling and word forms, and choose vocabulary that expresses the intended relationship between causes and effects.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You use both simple and attempted complex sentences, including a cause-and-effect structure with “due to” and a concession in the conclusion. However, complex constructions are often faulty, and errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and punctuation occur throughout. For example, “which can detrimentally affects” should use the base verb after “can,” while “Excessive use of heavy vehicle is are associated” contains conflicting verb forms and number agreement. Commas are also misplaced in phrases such as “it is irrefutable that, a small number.” These errors sometimes interrupt understanding. Practise building accurate sentences with one main clause and a clearly controlled subordinate clause, then check subject–verb agreement, articles, and punctuation before adding more complexity.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.