Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

A number of individuals believe that the prime environmental issue of today's world is the decrease number of certain trees and animals. Others argue that there are more significant problems regarding natural environment. Although it is evident that lack of specific plants and animals in the wild can cause serious damage to the eco-system, problems like air and water pollution are more detrimental sides of environmental issues than losing few types of plants or animals.

Not having certain types of plants and animals could lead to the environmental disaster. Nowadays, pollution has become the main reason for losing healthy natural environment which is also contributing to the loss of sustainable eco-system in different countries. For instance, lack of snakes and crows from the natural environmrnt could cause terrible damage to the farming lands as these two creatures help reduce insects that are pernicious to harvesting crops and plants. However, such problem can be removed by taking serious actions by the environmentalists and the government of a country by implementing strict rules to protect these animals.

The main reason of environmental problems is the lack of regulations regarding water and air pollution. Water and air are the most vital elements of our environment. Without having clean water and air can completely wipe out our human civilisation. Therefore, these two natural elements are essential to keep our environment safe and secure, and to keep human race alive in this world. According to a research, people can only survive 2-3 minutes without oxyzen. So, constant pollution of air can literally take away our lives in mintunes.

In conclusion, even though loss of particular plants and animals could damage eco-system, pollution like air and water are more important environmental problems because without air and water noone can survive in this world.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both views and state a clear opinion: species loss can damage ecosystems, but you consider air and water pollution more serious. The examples of snakes and crows reducing crop-damaging insects, and of the need for clean air and water, are relevant to the discussion. However, the two sides are not developed equally. The species-loss paragraph focuses mainly on one example and says the problem can be addressed through rules, without explaining the wider consequences of extinction. The pollution argument is also asserted rather than fully supported; the claim that pollution could wipe out civilisation would benefit from a more precise explanation or example. Develop the causes and consequences of each problem more fully to make the discussion more convincing.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction presents the two views and your position, two body paragraphs discuss them, and a conclusion restates your opinion. Linking expressions such as “Although,” “For instance,” “However,” and “Therefore” help show relationships between ideas. At times, though, the progression within paragraphs is not fully smooth. In the first body paragraph, the discussion moves from species loss to pollution as its cause, then to the role of government rules, without clearly connecting these points. The second paragraph repeats the importance of air and water in several sentences. Use clearer topic sentences and make each supporting sentence develop one central point; vary or reduce linking phrases where the relationship is already clear.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “environmental issue,” “sustainable eco-system,” “pernicious,” “regulations,” and “civilisation.” These choices show an attempt to use more specific language, and the meaning is generally clear. Some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, however, such as “decrease number,” “losing few types,” “natural environmrnt,” and “take away our lives in mintunes.” There are also spelling errors, including “oxyzen” and “noone,” which reduce precision. Aim for natural combinations such as “declining numbers of species,” “loss of biodiversity,” and “severe air pollution.” Check spelling carefully and prefer precise, familiar phrasing when an ambitious expression does not sound natural.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including a concessive opening (“Although it is evident…”) and a conditional sentence (“Without having clean water and air…”). Most ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors affect accuracy. For example, “the decrease number” needs a grammatical noun phrase, and “Without having clean water and air can completely wipe out…” lacks a clear subject. In “the main reason … is the lack of regulations,” the relationship between the plural “problems” and singular “reason” is awkwardly expressed. Review articles, countable nouns, and sentence structure, especially when beginning with “without.” More consistently accurate complex sentences would make your argument easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.