Band 4.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-09-25

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.0)

The issue of loss of some species and importance envionmental problem has engendered considerable controversy in contemporary society, with divergent perspectives emerging regarding its overall significance. While one school of thought maintains that loss of some species and importance envionmental problem should be viewed from one particular standpoint, another contends that an alternative perspective deserves greater recognition. In my view, although both positions possess a degree of legitimacy, the latter perspective is ultimately more compelling. This essay will critically examine both viewpoints before reaching a reasoned conclusion.

At the outset, advocates of loss of some species and importance envionmental problem advance the contention that it constitutes a consequential aspect of modern society. Their standpoint is predominantly predicated upon the assumption that loss of some species and importance envionmental problem can exert a substantial influence on individuals and society at large. Moreover, proponents argue that its ramifications can transcend immediate circumstances and manifest themselves in multifaceted ways. From this perspective, therefore, loss of some species and importance envionmental problem represents an indispensable consideration that should not be underestimated or dismissed without due deliberation.

Conversely, an opposing school of thought maintains that loss of some species and importance envionmental problem should be approached from an entirely different perspective. The principal justification for this position is that its implications may be considerably more profound than they initially appear. Furthermore, supporters of this viewpoint contend that insufficient attention to the broader dimensions of loss of some species and importance envionmental problem could give rise to unforeseen and potentially detrimental consequences. Consequently, this perspective has gained substantial recognition among those who believe that a more comprehensive approach is indispensable.

In conclusion, it is evident that loss of some species and importance envionmental problem remains an inherently multifaceted issue, capable of being interpreted from contrasting standpoints. Although the arguments presented by both sides possess a certain degree of validity, I remain of the view that the latter perspective is more convincing. Ultimately, a balanced and comprehensive consideration of loss of some species and importance envionmental problem is indispensable if its broader implications are to be properly understood and appropriately addressed.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 3.0

The response demonstrates a severe lack of task engagement. Rather than addressing the specific prompt concerning whether the loss of particular plant and animal species is the main environmental problem compared to others, the student has relied heavily on a generic template. The phrases 'loss of some species and importance envionmental problem' are awkwardly inserted throughout the essay as a substitution for addressing the actual topic, indicating a complete failure to develop relevant ideas or present a clear position. The arguments are circular, vague, and devoid of any specific examples or real-world application. Consequently, the response does not address all parts of the task appropriately and falls significantly short of the descriptive criteria for higher bands.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.0

Despite the severe content limitations, the essay exhibits a structured framework with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is used appropriately to delineate the different sections of the text. However, cohesion is heavily mechanical and repetitive, relying on formulaic transition phrases such as 'At the outset,' 'Conversely,' and 'In conclusion.' Furthermore, referencing is severely impaired because the repeated substitution phrases do not logically connect to form a coherent progression of ideas. While the overall visual structure mimics an academic essay, the internal logical progression fails to build a cohesive argument.

Lexical Resource: Band 3.5

The lexical range is extremely restricted and heavily dependent on repetitive boilerplate phrases. The student makes numerous severe lexical errors and awkward collocations, such as 'importance envionmental problem' (with a spelling error) repeated verbatim multiple times throughout the response. There is a lack of flexibility, precision, or awareness of appropriate academic style. Vocabulary is used mechanically rather than meaningfully to convey ideas, resulting in language that significantly strains the reader and fails to demonstrate a functional vocabulary for an academic writing task.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The essay displays a moderate range of complex sentence structures, such as 'While one school of thought maintains that... another contends that...' and 'Although the arguments presented by... I remain of the view that...'. However, the grammatical accuracy within these structures is severely undermined by the nonsensical insertion of template phrases that disrupt syntactic integrity. There are noticeable errors in word forms and spelling ('envionmental'). While some complex forms are attempted, the high frequency of unnatural phrasing and repetitive structural patterns limits the overall control and accuracy of grammar.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.