Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Undoubtly, music helps to bring people together from distinct background and culture. I partially agree with this statement because society have different languages according to the culture.

On the one hand, Media such as music brings people together. To elaborate, Music is a better way to convey crucial message into people. Music enables people to bring together without any discrimination and Every individual enjoys the vibe of the songs. Additionally, If different people dance together on same music , it will create harmony and unity between people. Individual get an opportunity to know about different culture and traditions which resulting in development of people's cognitive thinking .For instance, International concert brings people together and everyone enjoy same songs and do corporation with others.

However, sometimes music theory will not apply on every situation. To explain, Every culture has different language and cultural songs. Some people may not comprehend other cultural songs . Apart from that, people enjoy own their traditional songs rather than modern songs . As every one have different preferences on music .Likewise, Some Indian people love to listen their own indian songs instead of k-pop music . Consequenty, they feel connected to their cultural songs and cultural heritage.

Consequently, Although, music connects different people from different culture, some people enjoy their own cultural songs. I partly agree because music create harmony and unity however everyone has different choices for songs .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You give a relevant, partly agreeing position and address both the unifying potential of music and the fact that listeners may prefer their own traditions. The concert example and the contrast with Indian listeners who prefer Indian songs help make your points concrete. However, the position is not fully consistent: the opening says society has different languages, while the conclusion repeats that you partly agree without clarifying how far music can overcome those differences. Several claims, such as music conveying a “crucial message,” are asserted rather than explained. The response also contains 234 words, below the required 250, so the discussion has limited space to develop its reasons and examples. Extend the explanation of when music does or does not bridge cultural and age differences.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, a paragraph supporting music’s unifying role, a contrasting paragraph, and a conclusion. “On the one hand,” “However,” and “Consequently” signal the broad direction of the argument, so readers can follow the main contrast. Cohesion is sometimes mechanical, though, and some links do not express the relationship precisely. For example, “Consequently” introduces a preference for traditional songs, but the connection to the preceding point could be made clearer. The conclusion also repeats the introduction rather than drawing the two sides together. Use fewer formulaic transitions and connect each example directly to the claim it supports; clearer referencing would also help the ideas flow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including “harmony,” “unity,” “traditions,” “cultural heritage,” and “preferences.” There are also attempts at less common expressions, such as “cognitive thinking,” although this is not a natural choice in context. Noticeable word-choice, collocation, and spelling problems reduce precision: “do corporation” does not convey the intended idea, “own their traditional songs” is awkward, and “Undoubtly” and “Consequenty” are misspelled. Repetition of “people,” “culture,” and “songs” also limits the range. Build a more accurate set of collocations for discussing shared experiences and cultural differences, and check spelling and word forms during revision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including a conditional structure in “If different people dance together … it will create harmony” and a concession in the conclusion. However, the range is limited, and errors occur frequently enough to make some sentences awkward or difficult to process. Examples include “society have different languages,” “Individual get an opportunity,” and “everyone enjoy same songs,” where subject–verb agreement and article use are inaccurate. The sentence beginning “As every one have different preferences” is also a fragment, and the final sentence has an unclear structure around “I partly agree because.” Practise checking agreement, articles, plurals, and complete sentence boundaries, then vary sentence patterns while keeping each clause clear.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.