Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-09-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

As far as this topic is concerned, I strongly agree with the statement that music is an effective way of bringing people from different cultures and age groups together. Music is a universal form of communication that can create understanding and shared experiences.

Firstly, music can help people from different cultures connect with each other. People can enjoy songs from other countries even if they do not understand the language. For example, international music festivals bring people from different backgrounds together to enjoy performances and learn about other cultures. In this way, music can reduce cultural differences and promote friendship.

Secondly, music can connect people of different ages. Young people and older adults may have different interests, but they can enjoy certain types of music together. For instance, families often listen to traditional songs at weddings and other celebrations. Moreover, concerts and cultural events can provide opportunities for people of different generations to spend time together.

In conclusion, I strongly agree that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together. It can overcome lang

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response clearly presents a position stating strong agreement with the prompt. The writer attempts to address both aspects of the task, focusing on cultures and age groups respectively. However, the essay is incomplete, ending abruptly at 180 words due to the severe under-length penalty (falling well short of the 250-word minimum). Consequently, the ideas are somewhat truncated and under-developed, preventing the response from reaching higher bands. While the arguments are relevant, the lack of full development means the task is only partially addressed in terms of length and depth.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay demonstrates a clear overall structure, featuring an introduction, two distinct body paragraphs covering culture and age, and an attempted conclusion. Logical organisation is visible through sequential markers such as 'Firstly,' 'Secondly,' and 'In conclusion.' Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate ideas. Cohesive devices are functional, though basic (e.g., 'For example,' 'Moreover'). While the abrupt ending limits the overall flow of the conclusion, the progression up to that point is coherent and easy to follow.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, successfully incorporating terms relevant to the topic such as 'universal form of communication,' 'international music festivals,' and 'traditional songs.' Word choices are generally appropriate and communication is not impeded by lexical errors. However, the vocabulary tends to be standard and repetitive without demonstrating deep flexibility or precise control over less common lexical items, keeping the score solidly in the mid-range.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 7.0

The writer shows a good command of simple and complex sentence structures, using clauses effectively (e.g., 'People can enjoy songs from other countries even if they do not understand the language'). Grammatical accuracy is high throughout the produced text, with error-free sentences dominating the response. Punctuation is correctly handled. Although the structural range is somewhat constrained by the short length of the text, the grammar utilized is largely accurate and well-controlled.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.