Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-08-02

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 7.0)

The maps illustrate transformation of a grange park from the year 1920 to the present day. Overall, the park has experienced significant redevelopment, with several new facilities being added, while some original features have been removed. The area has become more organized and suitable for recreational activities. In 1920 the park mainly consisted areas for rose gardens, glasshouse, pond for water plants, seats, fountains to create a cool atmosphere accompanied with stage for musicians. At present the garden has changed its structure according to modern lifestyle. The rose garden has been relocated and placed centrally along with adjacent seats, pond for water plants were demolished and replaced by café, play area for children, a water feature has replaced fountain and the stage has now been expanded into a huge amphitheater for concerts. Additionally, an entrance for the underground car park has been made for the visitors. The new structures provide sources of entertainment for people of all age groups.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response7.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource6.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.5
Overall7.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.5

The response successfully identifies the main features of the park in 1920 and the present day. You have provided a clear overview and highlighted key changes, such as the relocation of the rose garden and the addition of the amphitheater and car park. To reach a higher band, ensure you include more precise comparisons. For instance, mentioning the specific locations (e.g., the north or south of the park) would provide a more detailed summary. The information is accurate, and the report covers all necessary aspects of the task, meeting the requirements for a Band 7.0.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is logically organized, starting with an overview and moving into a chronological comparison. You use transition words like 'Additionally' and 'At present' to guide the reader. However, the paragraphing is limited; the entire response is written as a single block. To improve, you should separate the introduction/overview from the body paragraphs to enhance the structure. While the flow of ideas is clear, the lack of paragraphing makes the text feel slightly dense. Improving the use of cohesive devices to link sentences more fluidly would also help elevate the score.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'redevelopment', 'demolished', and 'amphitheater' correctly. There are some minor issues with word choice and collocation, such as 'consisted areas' (should be 'consisted of areas') and 'accompanied with' (should be 'accompanied by'). While the vocabulary is sufficient to convey your meaning clearly, it lacks the flexibility and precision required for higher bands. Focusing on more sophisticated collocations and ensuring accurate preposition usage will help you achieve a higher score in this criterion.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5

The response uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors, such as missing articles ('a grange park', 'a water feature', 'a huge amphitheater') and minor punctuation issues. The phrase 'consisted areas for' is grammatically incomplete. While these errors do not impede communication, they occur frequently enough to prevent a higher score. To improve, focus on article usage and ensuring that verbs are followed by the correct prepositions. Increasing the variety of complex sentence structures while maintaining accuracy will also be beneficial.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.