Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-08-17
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
These are plans of a park that was constructed in 1920 and is still there even after a century with necessary renovations.
In 1920, the center of the park was a beautiful fountain whereas in present day it has a beautiful rose garden covered with seats for the people to sit and enjoy the scenic views.
There was a glasshouse in the early days of the park, which was later removed from the plans of renovation and was gradually destroyed.
In the 90s, play area for children were not quite common amongst public places so was the situation with this park, to attract more people and facilitate the children a children's play area was constructed later on.
These plans show a significant change in the park over the years and highlights the change in culture, like in the early stages of 19th century, musicians were quite popular and people were fond of them with that in mind the park had an stage for musicians which was later on coverted into an amphitheatre for concerts as trends changed among new generations.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response covers the main features of the park's transformation, such as the fountain, glasshouse, and play area. However, it fails to provide a clear overview or summary of the overall changes, which is a requirement for Task 1. The inclusion of subjective commentary, such as 'beautiful' and 'in the 90s, play area for children were not quite common', is unnecessary and detracts from the objective, analytical tone required for a report. Furthermore, the description of the musician's stage is speculative rather than based on the provided data. To improve, focus strictly on reporting the visual information provided in the plans without adding external opinions or historical assumptions.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0
The response is presented as a single block of text rather than distinct paragraphs, which hinders the logical flow. While there is a basic attempt to sequence the information, the lack of paragraphing makes the text feel cluttered. Cohesive devices are used, but they are sometimes repetitive or used in a way that feels slightly mechanical. For example, the transition between the description of the fountain and the glasshouse is abrupt. To achieve a higher band, ensure that you group related information into clear paragraphs and use a wider variety of linking words to connect your ideas more fluidly.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, but it lacks the precision and academic tone expected at higher levels. Phrases like 'beautiful rose garden' and 'people were fond of them' are too informal for an academic report. There is some attempt to use specific terminology, such as 'amphitheatre' and 'renovations', which is positive. However, the word choice is often simplistic. To improve, focus on using more precise, descriptive language related to spatial changes and map features, such as 'replaced by', 'situated in the north', or 'underwent significant modification'.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0
The response contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are several grammatical errors that affect clarity. For instance, 'play area for children were' contains a subject-verb agreement error, and 'coverted' is a spelling mistake. The phrase 'so was the situation with this park' is awkward and grammatically imprecise. While the meaning is generally clear, the frequency of these errors prevents the writing from reaching a higher band. Focus on proofreading for subject-verb agreement and ensuring that complex sentences are constructed accurately to avoid confusion.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
