Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-09-12

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

There are so many changes in these 2 poictures given which indicate the Grange Park in 1920 and today's scenes. In 1920 there was entrance different side then now. The entrance start from the top middle and below middle of the picture. Top middle entrance: which is between 2 rose garden. Below middle there was seats on the left and glasshouse at the right side. At the today's scene we can see the entrance start from the middle of the top and middle of the bottom. The right bellow we can notice a new thing which is a underground pass way infront of the water feature and the thing is, in 1920 there was no water feature right there and there was seats at the right below and the right bottom there was a glasshouse at there. There must have a major changes here at today's picture. We also can notice the fountain located at the middle of the park in 1920 but in today's time we can see there is a huge rose garden with some seating arrangement every side of it (cover 4 sides). At the left side we can see in 1920 picture of the park, there was two seats at the top and bottom corner of the picture but now the seat is missing in today's picture. another big difference when you enter the park from eldon street then head to the rose garden and turn left to go to the stage for musicians in 1920 picture but today's time there is amphitheatre for concerts which is looking better and a huge changes. In 1920 the arnold avenue entrance side rose garden: there was a pond for water plants at the right up corner of the picture which in today's day is a children's play area. Another thing is in 1920 the eldon street entrance, if you enter from there you might nootice roase garden beside the seats but today there is empty space out there.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.0
Coherence and Cohesion4.5
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy4.5
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response attempts to cover the main features of the park in both 1920 and the present day, such as the changes to the entrances, the replacement of the fountain with a rose garden, and the addition of the underground subway and amphitheatre. However, the information is presented in a somewhat disorganised manner, moving back and forth between locations without a clear overview or logical grouping. The summary lacks an overall introductory overview highlighting the most striking transformations, which prevents it from reaching a higher band. Nevertheless, it does attempt to address all parts of the visual data.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 4.5

The response lacks effective paragraphing, as it is presented almost entirely as a single dense block of text, making it difficult to follow. There is a lack of clear progression, and the transitions between different parts of the park feel abrupt and disjointed. Cohesive devices are weak or repetitive, heavily relying on phrases like 'at the today's scene' and 'in 1920 picture'. Referencing is often unclear, with pronouns and spatial markers such as 'the thing is' and 'there must have a major changes here' causing confusion for the reader.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is quite basic and repetitive, frequently reusing terms like 'picture', 'entrance', 'rose garden', and 'seats'. There are several unnatural word choices and phrasing errors, such as '2 poictures', 'today's scene', 'right bellow', and 'underground pass way'. Less common lexical items are attempted, such as 'amphitheatre' and 'glasshouse', but overall the range is limited and reflects noticeable inadequacies in collocation and word formation.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 4.5

The response demonstrates a limited range of grammatical structures, relying heavily on simple sentences and overly conversational phrasing like 'we can notice' and 'there is'. There are frequent grammatical and structural errors throughout the text, including missing prepositions ('at the right side', 'every side of it'), tense inconsistencies, and faulty clause structures (e.g., 'another big difference when you enter... but today's time there is...'). These frequent errors can cause some difficulty for the reader.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.