Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-09-17

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The plans which are given below illustrate a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today. Basically, the plans are comparing the past of the park and it's present. The park is known as "GRANGE PARK" and it was first opened in 1920.

In past, The public park was consist of two main entrances, two rose gardens, a fountain, a pond for water plants, a glasshouse, a stage for musicians and seats which were setted in all these places. As time passes, the owners decided to renovate it and they made it more spacious and beautiful.

Now in present, the park looks more charming and more things are added to it. Now, there are three entrances, the two entrances are same but the third entrance is underground for car paking. Now there is a cafe for breakfast, lunch and dinner, play area for children, an amphitheatre for concerts is also added in the park. There are also two rose garden but one rose garden is in the middle of the park and there are 4 type of seats for the visitors around the middle rose garden.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The candidate addresses the task by describing the main features of Grange Park in 1920 and today, noting key changes such as the addition of the amphitheatre, café, and underground car park entrance. However, the response contains several inaccuracies and unsupported details regarding the source material. For instance, the text claims 'there are three entrances, the two entrances are same but the third entrance is underground for car paking' and mentions a cafe for 'breakfast, lunch and dinner', information which is not present on the plan. Furthermore, the overview is rather basic and repetitive. While some comparisons are made, the development of ideas is limited, leading to a Band 5.5 performance for this criterion.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The response is divided into three paragraphs: an introduction, an overview of the past, and a description of the present. While paragraphing is attempted, the overall progression lacks sophistication. Cohesive devices are basic and repetitive, such as the frequent use of 'Now' and 'In past' / 'Now in present'. Reference words are occasionally unclear or clunky, as seen in 'seats which were setted in all these places'. The organizational structure is somewhat disjointed, but it maintains an overall logical flow that allows the reader to follow the general comparison, fitting the Band 5.0 descriptors.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is relatively simple and repetitive ('more charming', 'more things are added', 'two rose garden'). There are several word choice and inflection errors, such as 'paking' (parking), 'setted' (set), and 'two rose garden' (gardens). Attempts at less common vocabulary are limited, and the range is just about adequate to convey basic ideas about the park map. Because of the noticeable errors and restricted range of vocabulary, a band score of 5.0 is appropriate.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, but control over grammar is weak. There are frequent errors in verb tense and voice, such as 'The public park was consist of' (consisted of) and 'were setted'. Articles and pluralization are also mishandled ('in past', 'two rose garden', 'for car paking'). Punctuation and comma splices appear throughout the text, such as in the opening sentence. Because these errors occur frequently and occasionally impede smooth reading, the writing sits comfortably within the Band 5.0 category.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.