Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-10-02

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The maps illustrates a public park when it first opened in 1920 and now same park open nowadays .

Overall , threr is alot of difference in the park many things are transformed . In the enterance of ARNOLD STREET the fountain in the centre of the entrance is transformed into rose garden with seats and the stage of musicians is replace with amphitheatre for concert . and pound for water plants is change into childrens play area . alot of changes occur between these years .

To begin with , the entrance of the park the right side of entrance there was aglasshouse which is transformed with water feature . In the centre of entrance the fountain is change into garden rose with seats . To the left side of the fountain there is a stage for musicians which is replace with amphitheatre for concerts .

Furthermore , on the left side of the entrance threre was a rose garden and seats now there is nothing on the left side of the entrance . On the entrance of ARNOLD AVENUE there were a rose garden on both side but now on the left side of entrance there is acafe and near the cafe there is a childrens play area .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses the task partially by identifying some major changes between the 1920 and current maps of Grange Park. However, the position is not always clear, and several details are inaccurately reported or confused. For instance, the student states that on the right side of the entrance there was a glasshouse which was transformed into a water feature, when the water feature is actually in the south-east corner and the glasshouse was in a different position. Furthermore, the overall summary is very brief and repetitive, noting that a lot of changes occur without clearly synthesizing the overarching trends. To move to a higher band, all key features need to be accurately reported without spatial confusion, and the overview must present a clearer, more developed summary of the main transformations.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

There is some organization evident through the use of basic sequencing phrases such as 'To begin with' and 'Furthermore', but the overall progression lacks clarity. Paragraphing is attempted, yet the body paragraphs are disjointed and repetitive, often looping back to describe the same entrance areas multiple times. Cohesive devices are frequently inaccurate or used mechanically, and referencing between sentences is often unclear, leaving the reader to decipher which part of the park is being referred to. To achieve a higher band, the information must be logically sequenced in a progressive manner, avoiding redundancy, and cohesive devices should connect ideas smoothly rather than artificially.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is limited and minimally adequate for the task, with frequent spelling errors such as 'enterance' and 'pound' instead of 'pond'. Word choices are often repetitive, relying heavily on basic verbs like 'transformed', 'change', and 'replace'. There are also issues with word formation and collocation, such as 'garden rose' instead of 'rose garden'. These lexical shortcomings and spelling mistakes occasionally cause difficulty for the reader. To reach the next band, the student needs to employ a wider and more precise range of vocabulary, including less common lexical items related to maps and changes, while maintaining accurate spelling and word formation.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response demonstrates a very limited range of grammatical structures, relying mostly on simple sentences and straightforward descriptive patterns. Attempts at more complex sentences are often faulty, plagued by missing articles, incorrect prepositions, and persistent agreement issues, such as 'The maps illustrates' and 'there were a rose garden'. Punctuation is also weak, with spacing errors around commas and periods. Frequent grammatical errors cause noticeable strain and difficulty for the reader throughout the text. To progress, the writer must incorporate a greater variety of complex structures with improved accuracy, paying closer attention to subject-verb agreement, articles, and tense consistency.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.