Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-10-04

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The map illustrate the conparison between the park structure from 1920 to the current decade.

overall there several changes made in todays era in the park. One crucial change is the develpent of underground car park, the fountain evolves into huge water features, the stage for musician changes into ampitheatre for concerts, and also the develepment of new rose garden with chaires all around the garden where public can sit and chill and that is made in the centre of the park. If we talk about the pond for water plant it has been converted into a childeren play area along with the cafe on the left corner of the childeren park. In the past there were three rose garden in the park but in todays time there is only one rose garden in front of ampitheatre. Furtheremore the glasshouse has been demolished and the seats all around the park has also been removed. Overall several changes has done to the park but name remains the same for decades and will remain the same in the coming future

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The response successfully addresses all parts of the prompt by presenting an overview of Grange Park in 1920 and comparing it with the layout today. Key changes are identified, such as the introduction of an underground car park, the replacement of the fountain with a water feature, and the conversion of the pond into a children's play area. However, some features are under-developed or described with slight inaccuracies, such as claiming that all seats around the park were removed when many remain or have been repositioned. To reach a higher band, the student should ensure that all major spatial shifts are reported with complete accuracy and that every selected feature is fully supported by the visual data without over-generalising.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response demonstrates some organisation, but it lacks a clear overall progression and suffers from poor paragraphing, as almost the entire text is condensed into a single run-on block of sentences. Cohesive devices are basic and sometimes mechanical or repetitive, relying heavily on conversational framing like 'If we talk about' or 'Furtheremore'. Referencing is also occasionally unclear, making it difficult for the reader to follow the spatial flow smoothly across the park's layout. To improve, the writer must divide the response into logical paragraphs—such as a clear introduction, an overview, and distinct body paragraphs for specific areas—and employ a wider, more natural variety of cohesive markers to guide the reader.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, with clear attempts to use less common items such as 'develpent', 'ampitheatre', and 'demolished'. However, there are notable spelling and word-choice errors throughout the text, including 'conparison', 'develpent', 'ampitheatre', 'chaires', and 'childeren', which stem from phonetic spelling and minor slips. While these errors do not severely impede communication, they reflect a limited control over word forms and spelling at this level. To achieve a higher band, the student needs to broaden their lexical range, demonstrate more precision in spelling and collocations, and avoid repetitive phrasing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, but control over grammar and punctuation is inconsistent. There are frequent errors in basic sentence structure, article usage, and subject-verb agreement, such as 'The map illustrate', 'there several changes made', and 'several changes has done'. Punctuation is also problematic, marked by run-on sentences joined by commas rather than proper conjunctions or full stops. To move up, the student must eliminate frequent foundational errors, improve control over tense consistency when describing maps, and use complex structures with greater accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.