Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-10-04

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The plans display a public park when it first opened in 1920 and same park today.

Overall, it can be seen that Grange park has developed significantly throughout the period with improved infrastructure and extended area.In contrast, new facilities like cafe, amphitheatre and water feature have been added.

In 1920, the entrance of park was in both side near Eldon street in south side and Arnold avenue in north side. On the left side of south entrance seats were placed , while on the right side glasshouse was located with another seats acess. In the center of the park, a fountain was situated near which a stage was placed for musicians. On the northeast side a pond for water plants was build and rose gardens were placed in northeast , northwest and southeast side with lots of seats.

By now, the entrance of park in north and south side have not changed. Glass house has been removed and water feature is added in that place.

fountain has been demolish to build a big rose garden with seats. Stage for musicians has modified to Amphitheatre for concerts with huge space. Children play area and cafe have added for the safety of children and visitors service.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses all parts of the task by reporting the main features of Grange Park in 1920 and today, noting key changes such as the removal of the glasshouse and the addition of the amphitheatre and cafe. However, some ideas are under-developed or less fully covered. For instance, the overview contains a minor inaccuracy by stating the park has an 'extended area', which is not supported by the visual data since the boundaries remain identical. Furthermore, certain details are vague, and some comparisons lack precision. To reach a higher band, the writer needs to ensure that all overview statements strictly align with the visual facts and that every major feature is described with greater clarity and depth.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response maintains a coherent overall arrangement with a clear attempt to structure the information chronologically, discussing the 1920 layout first and the present layout second. Paragraphing is used to separate the introduction, overview, and body paragraphs. However, cohesion is sometimes faulty and mechanical. There is a lack of smooth transitions between sentences, and referencing is occasionally unclear, such as abrupt shifts in spatial descriptions (e.g., jumping between locations without cohesive signposts). To improve, the writer should employ a wider and more accurate range of cohesive devices and ensure that ideas flow logically from one sentence to the next to create a stronger sense of progression.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The writer demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting less common items related to park features such as 'infrastructure', 'amphitheatre', and 'water feature'. However, there are noticeable vocabulary and spelling errors, such as 'acess' instead of access, 'build' instead of built, 'demolish' instead of demolished, and 'has modified' instead of has been modified. Word choice is sometimes imprecise, and collocation could be strengthened. These inaccuracies do not heavily impede communication, but they restrict the score. To progress, the writer must focus on correct word formation, accurate spelling, and more natural phrasing when describing spatial changes.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response displays a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, but control over grammar and punctuation is inconsistent. There are frequent errors in article usage (e.g., 'the entrance of park', 'in both side'), prepositional patterns (e.g., 'in south side'), subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'fountain has been demolish'), and tense consistency. While these errors rarely completely obscure the meaning, they occur frequently throughout the text. To achieve a higher band, the writer needs to improve the accuracy of basic grammatical structures, pay closer attention to articles and prepositions, and ensure that passive voice constructions and verb tenses are formed correctly.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.