Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-10-06
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 4.5)
The plan gives information about a citizen park, that was first time exhibited since individual's spare time in the year of 1920, while it was similar prominent areas and built new leisure points at Grange Park today.
Overall, this plan is related to the, The Grange Park, that is compared between both time 1920 and in the present. The value of this park was literally modified in this past year, while it has become more facilities and created excited places for public amusement.
In 1920, Grange Park which was located at the street of Arnold Avenue. There were more categories of people lesiure areas such as Rose Garden, Seats, Pond for water plants and fountain.
The park's places were bite more different in 1920 rather than present time.
The Grange Park is sheltered same place in approximately time, it has become more advanced compared with at past time. The are more new places, cafe, water features and children play areas
In conclusion, the park had comparison between at the periods of time, both period places were similar and new for people activities.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 4.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 4.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 4.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 4.5 |
| Overall | 4.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5
The response makes an attempt to describe the changes to Grange Park between 1920 and the present, satisfying the basic requirement of addressing the task. However, the treatment of information is very limited and lacks precision. While some features are mentioned, such as the cafe, water features, and children's play areas, key comparisons are incomplete or inadequately developed. The overview is very weak and repetitive, failing to clearly summarize the main overall trends of modernization and layout restructuring shown in the visual data. Furthermore, several parts of the response drift into vague generalizations rather than reporting specific features from the maps.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.0
The organization of the response is extremely basic and lacks a clear, logical progression. Although paragraphs are used to separate different sections, the overall arrangement is hindered by poor sequencing and awkward transitions, such as 'In conclusion, the park had comparison between at the periods of time'. Cohesive devices are used very mechanically and often inappropriately, leading to confusion. Additionally, referencing is frequently unclear; for example, pronouns and demonstratives like 'this plan is related to the, The Grange Park' fail to connect ideas smoothly, making the text difficult to follow throughout.
Lexical Resource: Band 4.5
The vocabulary used is basic, repetitive, and heavily restricted. The student relies on simple and imprecise terms such as 'citizen park', 'leisure points', and 'excited places', which strain communication and demonstrate limited control over word choice and collocation. There are noticeable word-formation errors and awkward phrasing, such as 'it has become more facilities' instead of 'it has gained more facilities'. Less common lexical items are attempted, but they are generally inaccurate or inappropriately applied, keeping the range at a minimal level.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5
The grammatical structures employed are very limited, consisting mostly of simple and flawed complex sentences. There are frequent and persistent errors in verb forms, tense usage, articles, and prepositions, such as 'first time exhibited since individual's spare time in the year of 1920' and 'The are more new places'. Sentence structures are often incomplete or tangled, leading to frequent errors that impede readability and cause significant difficulty for the reader. Punctuation control is also weak, further detracting from overall clarity.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.