Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The two map compare the layout of grange park when it first opened in 1920 with its how looks today.

Overall, the park has underground car park is major transformation. Traditional features like the musicians, fountain and glasshouse have been removed to make room for modern recreational facilities like a cafe, children's play area and amphitheater.

In 1920, the center of the park featured a large fountain, but this has today been replaced by central rose garden surrounded seating. In the western section, the original stage for musicians and its surrounding rose garden have been converted into a much larger amphitheater for concerts.

Significant changes also look place on the eastern side of the park. The old pond for water plants and a rose garden in the northern corner were removed to build a new cafe and children's play area. In the southeast corner, the glasshouse was demolished to make way for a modern water feature. Lastly, while the main northern and southern entrances remain the same, a new entreance has been added in the southeast corner of the park.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

The response gives a clear overview of the park’s main transformation, contrasting removed traditional features with newer facilities, and it reports several key changes accurately: the central fountain becomes a rose garden, the western area becomes an amphitheatre, and the former pond and glasshouse sites are redeveloped. The comparison of the entrances is also relevant. This meets the task well, with a clear focus on the most notable changes. However, the description of the eastern side is somewhat over-generalised: the north-west rose garden remains, while the café replaces the northern rose garden east of the entrance. The response also does not mention that seats now surround the central garden. Including these details would make the account more precise and fully developed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The information is organised in a clear progression: an introduction and overview are followed by the central and western changes, then the eastern side and entrances. Linking expressions such as “Overall,” “In 1920,” “In the western section,” and “Lastly” help guide the reader through the comparison, and the paragraphing is appropriate. The sequence is easy to follow, although some transitions are a little formulaic, and the eastern-side paragraph groups several separate changes without distinguishing the café’s location from the play area’s. More precise referencing and a slightly more varied use of cohesive devices would make the progression smoother. Overall, the organisation is logical and the relationships between most features are clear.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.5

The response uses a suitable range of map vocabulary, including “converted,” “surrounded,” “demolished,” “replaced,” and “make way for,” which helps describe changes concisely. It also uses relevant facility names and directional language. Some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or awkward, however: “the park has underground car park is major transformation” does not express the intended overview clearly, and “Significant changes also look place” contains an incorrect phrase. “Central rose garden surrounded seating” also needs a more natural construction. These slips do not prevent the reader from understanding the main comparisons, but they limit precision and naturalness. More accurate collocations and careful proofreading of spelling would strengthen the vocabulary control.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

There is a mix of simple and more complex sentence forms, including the contrast in “while the main northern and southern entrances remain the same” and the passive construction “have been converted.” Most of the intended meaning remains understandable. However, some grammatical errors occur in key sentences. The opening has faulty structure in “The two map compare … with its how looks today,” and the overview lacks a complete, correctly formed clause in “the park has underground car park is major transformation.” In “central rose garden surrounded seating,” the passive or participial relationship is not expressed correctly. These errors show that complex ideas are being attempted, but sentence formation and agreement need more consistent control. Check each sentence for a clear subject and verb, and use articles and passive forms accurately.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.