Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-10-12

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The plans compares public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today. Parks are considered as crucial part of a developed society. Developed countries are fully packed with public parks as it is seen as source of entertainment.

Firstly, today the grange park comprises of rose garden in the middle of park. In west, it contains an amphitheatre. Above amphitheater their is a rose garden. At top east, their is a children's play area. For relaxing their is a cafe along with the play area. Above the entrance underground park, their is a water feature which makes the park more beautiful.

If we have a glance at the condition of park a few years back, their was a stage for musicians in place of the amphitheatre. Similarly, today their is a rose garden but in 1920 their was a fountain in place of it. There was a pond for water plants at the top east of the park. There was a glasshouse in place of the water feature.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You identify several important changes, including the central fountain being replaced by a rose garden, the musicians’ stage becoming an amphitheatre, and the pond and glasshouse being replaced by a play area and water feature. However, the response does not give a clear overview of the park’s overall transformation, and it omits notable features such as the café’s location, the underground car-park entrance, and the seats surrounding the central garden. The opening comments about parks in developed countries are not supported by the plans and take space away from relevant comparisons. Some locations are also imprecise: the café is east of the north entrance, not simply “along with” the play area. Focus on the mapped changes and summarise the main pattern.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

The response has a basic sequence: it describes the park today and then compares it with 1920. Phrases such as “Firstly” and “Similarly” help signal this movement, and the paragraphs separate the present from the past. However, the opening generalisation about public parks interrupts the description rather than introducing a clear overview. Within the first main paragraph, features are listed one after another without grouping them by area or explaining how they relate. Repeated use of “their” to introduce locations also makes the progression mechanical and sometimes unclear. Organise the response around an overview followed by grouped comparisons—for example, changes in the centre and west, then changes along the northern and southern edges.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some relevant vocabulary for describing a plan, including “amphitheatre,” “rose garden,” “pond for water plants,” and “water feature.” These terms help identify the park’s facilities, and the reader can generally understand the intended comparisons. However, the range of location and change language is limited, with repeated phrases such as “in place of” and “at the top east.” Some choices are imprecise or unnatural, including “above the entrance underground park” and “fully packed with public parks.” Use more precise map language and verbs that describe change, such as “replaced,” “relocated,” or “remained.” Check spelling and word forms too, including “amphitheatre” and “café,” to make the description more polished.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response mainly uses simple sentences, with a few attempts to link comparisons, as in “There was a stage for musicians in place of the amphitheatre.” This gives the description a basic grammatical framework, but errors recur in agreement, articles, and sentence construction. For example, “The plans compares” should use a plural verb, while “comprises of rose garden” has an incorrect verb pattern and is missing an article. The repeated construction “their is” should be “there is,” and “a few years back” does not accurately express the comparison with 1920. These errors do not usually prevent understanding, but they reduce accuracy. Practise accurate present and past forms and vary sentence patterns to compare features directly.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.