Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-09
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
There are lots of student in this world who believe that, in order to achieve success they need to put all of their energy into one specific goal. That's why they often try to avoid the idea of learning other subjects along with their main subjects. On the other hand, some students like exploring ang taking challenges. Along with their major subjects they would always look for something additional which can improve their skills and help them to buid their confidence.
The students who only chooses to continue focusing on their majors, have quite strong mentality to get a outstanding result in their major subjects. They will always make sure to use all of their time to prepare themselves. Studying something additional is like an extra burden to them. They consider everything else less important for that specific period of their life. After they achieve what they want, they would set their new goal and will start focusing on that with all they have. They do not believe in multitasking. According to their perspective mustitasking is a myth and whoever do that are going to end up having no strong backgroud on a specific field. Besides, if someone want to have multiskill then they should start learning them one after another. There is a proverb, ' jack of all trades, masters of none'. So, trying to learn everything at a time can never help someone in becoming a specialist in any specific field.
On the contrary, there are students who have deep interest in learning. They don't have any fear about scores. All they want is enjoying learning. They don't have any rush to become specialist. Their mentality encourages them to do multitasking. Only focusing in any specific subjects or goal makes them bore. To avoid the monotony, they love to add new subjects in their curriculum along with their majors. These students are quite curious and often they don't
have clear idea about what profession they want. So, they love exploring different subjects so they can find out what they like the most.
In my opinion, if the students have a very clear vision about what they want to do in their life. Then they should only focus on that. Avoiding anything extra during that phase is wise. But if somone is confused about their likes and dislikes then definitely they need to explore more. Instead of paying all attension for getting good grades on only majors, they need to check other subjects in order to get idea about vwhat would suit them the most. Besides, if someone have vision and still want to gather some extra knowledge about other subjects then obviously they can do it. But then they need to make sure that the extra subjects are not hampering his performance on main subjects.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
The response discusses both positions and gives a clear, conditional opinion: students with a defined career goal should concentrate on it, while those uncertain about their preferences can explore other subjects. The explanations are relevant, including the risk of spreading effort too thin and the value of discovering suitable interests. However, the two views are not developed equally: the case for focusing on a qualification receives more explanation, while the benefits of studying additional subjects are mainly linked to curiosity and avoiding monotony. Some claims, such as that focused students have a “quite strong mentality,” are asserted rather than supported with a concrete example. Develop the advantages of broader study—for instance, transferable skills or how another subject could complement a major—and illustrate your opinion more specifically.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The essay has a recognisable structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a concluding opinion. Contrast markers such as “On the other hand” and “On the contrary” help readers follow the discussion, and the conclusion returns to the central issue. Overall progression is clear, but cohesion is sometimes mechanical because several sentences begin with “They” or “These students,” and ideas within paragraphs can feel like a list. The final paragraph also contains several conditions in quick succession, making the position less smooth to follow. Use clearer references to the groups being discussed, and organise each body paragraph around a main reason followed by explanation or an example. This would make the links between claims more explicit and less repetitive.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
The response uses a reasonable range of topic vocabulary, including “major subjects,” “multitasking,” “monotony,” “specialist,” and “curriculum.” These choices allow the writer to discuss both focused study and exploration, and the meaning is generally understandable. However, spelling errors and imprecise or unnatural combinations reduce control: examples include “buid,” “backgroud,” “attension,” “paying all attention,” and “makes them bore.” Some expressions are also too informal or vague for an academic essay, such as “with all they have” and “something additional.” Aim for more precise academic collocations and proofread spelling. For example, describe students as “devoting their time to their major” and say that a narrow focus may “limit their broader development,” rather than relying on general phrases.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
There is a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including conditional structures such as “if someone is confused … then definitely they need to explore more” and clauses explaining students’ motivations. Most ideas remain understandable, but some errors in agreement, articles, and sentence construction recur. For example, “There are lots of student” needs a plural noun, “The students who only chooses” has a subject–verb agreement error, and “a outstanding result” uses the wrong article. The fragment “In my opinion, if the students have a very clear vision … Then they should only focus on that” should be joined into one sentence. Review agreement and articles, and check that each sentence has a complete main clause; this will improve accuracy while preserving the range of structures attempted.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.