Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The growing influence of studies has sparked various debates. It is significant because of its impact on both individuals and communities. Some higher education childrens studying main subjects along with that other subjects, while others view that it is important to give time and attention to studying for qualification. In this essay, I will discuss both perspectives in subsequent paragraphs along with my personal opinion and lead to a logical conclusion.

In order to state the points in favour of the first statements, the primary reason is that students want to acquire wide range of knowledge and enchance voculabory with the help of other subjects. Fine arts give them a chance to learn new skills such as leadership, teamwork and so on. Secondly, children do no want to restricted themselves particular sphere. For instance, if a child acquire medical stream and wanted to learn about past historical events so that they can appear themselves in competative exam. As a result, they open up their mind in every field so that they compete in exam.

On the other hand, others view that give full energy and time to studying for a qualification so that they appointed for high pay salary job. Moreover, children can score good grades in studies and maintain reputation in society. Other members view that waste time and money on other subject, while ignoreing main subject do not generate satisfactory result and lead individual towards downfall.

In conclusion, although both statements have valid points, I believe that learning other subjects encouage students to learn different method and technique as a result, build confidence, critical and analytical skills.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You address both views and state a preference for learning additional subjects, so the response is relevant to the task. The first view is supported with examples such as fine arts developing teamwork and a medical student learning history; the second mentions qualifications, employment and grades. However, these points are not consistently explained: the link between studying history and appearing in a competitive exam is unclear, and the argument about reputation is asserted rather than supported. Your opinion appears most clearly in the conclusion, while the introduction promises a discussion without indicating your position. Develop each main reason with a clearer explanation or a specific example, and make your view explicit from the beginning to address the task more fully.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. This gives the reader an overall route through the discussion, and transitions such as “On the other hand” and “In conclusion” help signal changes in direction. However, some connections between ideas are unclear, particularly the example about a medical student studying historical events and competing in an exam. The opening paragraph is also general and does not lead smoothly into the specific debate. Within paragraphs, points sometimes follow one another without showing how they relate. Use clearer topic sentences and explain the connection between each reason and its example; this would make progression more consistent and cohesion less dependent on formulaic transitions.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt vocabulary relevant to education and its benefits, including “qualification,” “teamwork,” “critical and analytical skills,” and “reputation in society.” These choices show an effort to discuss the topic beyond very basic terms. However, the range is limited by repeated general words such as “subjects,” “students,” and “learn,” while inaccurate spelling and collocation are noticeable: “enchance voculabory,” “high pay salary job,” and “appointed for” make some meanings less clear or natural. Some phrases, such as “open up their mind in every field,” are also imprecise. Build a more accurate set of education-related collocations and check spelling and word forms. More precise phrasing would help express your ideas without changing their intended meaning.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a contrast in the introduction and a conditional-style example beginning “if a child…”. However, complex structures are often faulty, and errors occur frequently enough to make parts of the argument difficult to follow. For example, “Some higher education childrens studying…” lacks a clear subject–verb structure, while “children do no want to restricted themselves” has problems with the auxiliary and verb form. In “others view that give full energy and time,” the clause is incomplete, and the conclusion’s final sentence lacks a clear grammatical connection between its ideas. Practise building complete sentences with a subject and finite verb, then check agreement, articles, and verb forms before adding subordinate clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.