Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Although the multi-subject education is considered an advanced way to make strong academic students with high level of knowlegde. but, it is also important to give the whole time and effort to one direction. So, it is often argued that some university students want to learn about other subjects beside their main ones. While others say that they should focus on the main subjects only. For my prespective, I believe the multi-subject education is more useful. In this essay I will discuss both views in detail.

One major reason why I agree with the first view is that, the students who learned about more than one group of subjects always have more information in different fields and this make them able to find more opportunities. For instance, If student has decided to study chemistry with enviromental science subjects, he would find jobs in two different fields. Furthermore, this will make him has more than income source which will make him financially stable.

However, others believe that students should give thier time and attention to studying for a qualification. This view depend on qualitative analysis not quantitative. For example, students who specialize in their main subjects and choose one learning field will be experts in these subjects and they will have more details in their main subjects.

In conclusion, While some students find that learning other subjects is the key to make them find more opportunities thaan others, other students find the specializing in onlu one group of subjects makes them have more information in these subjects. In my opinion, I support the first view.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You discuss both positions and state a clear preference for learning additional subjects, supported by the example of combining chemistry with environmental science. However, the response only partly develops the task: the benefits of broader study are explained mainly through job opportunities and income, while the case for concentrating on one qualification is stated briefly, without a specific example or fuller explanation. The conclusion repeats the two views but adds little to the argument. The response also contains 247 words, three words below the required minimum; the 17 words copied from the prompt are not counted. Develop both sides more fully and explain why your preferred approach is more valuable overall.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Basic signposting such as “For instance,” “Furthermore,” and “However” helps readers follow the discussion. However, progression within paragraphs is limited, and some links are awkward or repetitive: the introduction restates the two positions after already introducing them, while the conclusion largely repeats the same contrast. The opening “Although … but” also creates an unclear connection between ideas. Build each paragraph around one main point, explain it in a logical sequence, and use linking expressions accurately rather than relying on repeated contrast markers.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “specialize,” “qualification,” “opportunities,” and “financially stable,” so the main ideas are generally understandable. However, the range is limited and several noticeable spelling or word-choice errors reduce precision, such as “knowlegde,” “enviromental,” “prespective,” “thaan,” and “onlu.” Some phrases are also unnatural, including “one direction,” “more than income source,” and “qualitative analysis not quantitative.” Aim for accurate academic collocations and check spelling carefully. For example, describe students as pursuing “a single field of study,” and say that broader study may provide “additional career options” rather than “find more opportunities.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt a mixture of simple statements and longer sentences, including conditional forms such as “If student has decided to study chemistry … he would find jobs.” However, complex sentences are often faulty, and errors occur frequently enough to make some passages difficult to read. Examples include the sentence fragment beginning “Although,” followed by “but,” the agreement error “this make them,” and the construction “will make him has.” Articles and sentence boundaries also need attention: write “if a student,” and avoid joining a complete sentence to a new one with a comma. Practise building accurate complex sentences and check subject–verb agreement, verb forms, and punctuation before submitting.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.