Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-11
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Choosing co-curricular activites or subjects in universities have debate from recent years. Some students would like to study about additional subjects despite of main subject. While others argue that it is significant for students to pay all attention to pursue their qualification. Both aspects have positive influence I will discuss both views and give my own opinion.
On the onehand, the students who wants to study further subjects along their mian subjects have positive development for students and also for their mentally well-being. Firstly learning such subject in which student is getting interest he learns more quickly and somehow, having better for future studies and community also. Secondly, the major benefit of studying additional subject is that it expands mentally exposure of student to think and develop problem solving skills quickly. It greatly helps in academics as well as future job.
On the otherhand, students who believe that give attention and time to particular study having benefits for qualification. At first, students who pay attention to a subject experiences better in taking understanding concepts of a particular subject. It provides more future oppurtunities in jobs related to qualificatied in one subject. Secondly, master of one subject is quite ordinary rather then a teacher who have little experience of all subjects. His way of teaching, job work or any other thing related to his subject is much better. Furthermore, qualified in one subject gain honour and respect in all aspects of life.
To conclude with my own opinion, my view is that students must learn additional subjects if they are willing, because it have many benefits in the present as well as in future life in means of earnings, working experience also. While, qetting qualified in one subject is quite better in same ways.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You address both perspectives and give a personal view, so the response is relevant to the full task. The first body paragraph explains that additional subjects may build problem-solving skills and help with future work; the second presents deeper understanding and career opportunities as benefits of focusing on one qualification. However, these points are mostly asserted rather than developed with specific explanations or examples. The comparison that a specialist is better than a teacher with experience across subjects is also unclear and does not directly explain the value of concentrating on a qualification. Your opinion supports optional additional study, but the final sentence partly qualifies it without explaining when or why. Develop fewer points more fully and make your position consistent and explicit throughout.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Signposts such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “To conclude” help readers follow the discussion. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes mechanical, with repeated “Firstly,” “Secondly,” and “Furthermore,” rather than clear links showing how one idea leads to the next. Some references are difficult to follow, particularly “His way of teaching” after a discussion of students and qualifications. The conclusion also introduces earnings and work experience without clearly connecting them to the earlier reasoning. Use clearer topic sentences and link each supporting explanation directly to the point it develops.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You attempt vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “problem solving skills,” “qualification,” “future opportunities,” and “honour and respect.” However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, which sometimes makes meaning difficult to interpret. For example, “mentally exposure,” “having better for future studies,” and “master of one subject is quite ordinary” do not express your intended ideas clearly. Spelling errors such as “activites,” “oppurtunities,” and “qetting” also reduce accuracy. Build a bank of natural academic phrases for discussing benefits and trade-offs, and check spelling and word forms. Prefer precise expressions such as “broaden students’ perspectives” and “develop expertise in a field.”
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a contrast introduced by “While” and explanations beginning with “Firstly” and “Furthermore.” However, control is inconsistent, and errors in sentence structure, agreement, articles, and verb forms occur throughout. For example, “Choosing co-curricular activities or subjects in universities have debate” lacks a clear grammatical structure, while “the students who wants” has subject–verb disagreement. In “students who believe that give attention and time,” the clause is incomplete, and “it have many benefits” also has incorrect agreement. These problems sometimes make the intended meaning hard to follow. Practise building complete sentences around one main clause, then check agreement and verb forms before adding subordinate clauses.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.