Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-11
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
In recent years, there was an argument in university students about their studies.Some people believe that focusing on compulsory subjects were essential than wasting time on other subjects.Which are not a part of syllabus.However other's want to learn different subjects along with their studies.In this essay, I will discuss both views with examples.
Intelligent and well-off students had a time for other subjects but on the other side weak and poor students did not have this ability to spend their time on other topics.Moreover, gaing knowledge helps them to open a wide range career option. For instance, Musa Zaheer was a perfect example of an effcient student. Who got a degree in Medical field.But he had been learning computer programs along with their studies.He started earning, when he was in university. He had a job in multinational company at dubia. His monthly salary is more than an ordinary doctor would have.
Degree oriented students believe that focusing on core subjects is significant.The reason behind this mindset is they are concerned about their future goals.They donot want to take any risk in their final exams.
Every field students faces challenges in understanding the branches of their certain field and they have to work hard in practical term or theoryical term.In addition, Yasir Emeed was a popular example of experienced and mastered engineer.He stood first in his university and he won a prize of young engineer who build a wonder full creative art.His projects were famous all over the world.
In conclusion, both ideas had their own advantages but taking interests in another subjects helps to know about other opportunities in different fields.In my opinion, participating in other subjects had a great positive development in professional life.Additionally, knowlege is a best reward and gift that everyone have an option to obtain this.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You discuss both views and make your preference clear in the conclusion: you favour learning additional subjects because they can reveal career opportunities. The examples of Musa Zaheer and Yasir Emeed also show an effort to support the discussion. However, the first view is not fully explained: the claim that some students have more time or ability to study other subjects is asserted rather than explored, and the second example mainly describes an engineer’s achievement without clearly showing why concentrating on a qualification is valuable. Your position is clearest at the end, rather than being established and maintained throughout. Explain the benefits and drawbacks of each approach more directly, and connect each example explicitly to the point it illustrates.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
The response has a recognisable introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion, so the reader can identify its broad structure. You also use signposts such as “Moreover,” “In addition,” and “In conclusion.” However, progression within paragraphs is often unclear: the first body paragraph moves from students’ circumstances to career options and then to a detailed personal example without clearly linking each step. Some transitions are inaccurate or abrupt, including “but on the other side,” while the conclusion repeats the general preference rather than drawing together the discussion. Several sentences are also separated by full stops where their ideas need a clearer connection. Organise each body paragraph around one main claim, then explain and illustrate it in a logical sequence.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You attempt vocabulary relevant to education and careers, including “compulsory subjects,” “core subjects,” “career option,” and “professional life.” These choices show some range beyond basic everyday language. However, word choice, collocation, word forms, and spelling are often inaccurate or awkward, which sometimes makes the intended meaning less clear. Examples include “gaing knowledge,” “a wide range career option,” “degree oriented students,” and “a wonder full creative art.” There are also inconsistent or incorrect forms such as “effcient” and “knowlege.” Aim for natural combinations and check spelling and word forms carefully. For example, describe students as “focused on their degree” and say that broader study can “expand their career opportunities.”
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “students … who build a wonder full creative art” and a reason clause beginning “The reason behind this mindset is…”. However, complex sentences are often incomplete or inaccurately formed, and errors occur frequently enough to make some relationships difficult to follow. For instance, “Which are not a part of syllabus” is a fragment, and “Every field students faces” has faulty subject–verb agreement. Tense and article use are also inconsistent, as in “In recent years, there was an argument” and “a best reward.” Review sentence boundaries, agreement, articles, and consistent tense. Build accuracy in shorter sentences before combining ideas into longer structures.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.