Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

It is widely argued that many university students wish to learn about some minor courses as well as their major subjects, while others claim that it is more important for them to give all their effort and time to complete their degrees. I firmly believe that having the desire to learn about other subjects along with the main subjects is a better approach as it enhances the knowledge of a person.

To begin with, one of the significant reason why some university students prefer to study other subjects along with their major is to strengthen their knowledge about the real world. When a student studies a course other than his major, it enables him to explore different opportunities and to learn how real world think about a matter. For example, if a student from Chemistry department wants to study about Economics, it will help him to know about how economics functions in the world. It will alllow him to manage and use of his income in a better way and he will be able to contribute in financial planning of his family.

On the other hand, some students want to finish their degree as early as possible by giving their all time and effort. The reason for this that most of the students come from a middle income family. Their family work hard for their children to be graduated from a university and had a high expectations on their children. For that reason, a student devotes all of his time and attention for qualification and wants to enter the job market to contribute to their family and fulfill their family's expectations.

In opinion, I think that a student should know about other subjects as well as their main subjects because it will help them to understand a topic in a more logical way and allows them to think about a decision critically.

In conclusion, although some students prefer to complete their courses quickly in order to support their family, I always believe that it is always better to know about other subjects as well since it makes us complete, logically sound and best at thinking and planning about our decisions.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You address both views and state a clear opinion: you support studying additional subjects because this broadens knowledge and improves critical thinking. The Chemistry-and-Economics example gives a relevant illustration, while the discussion of students’ family responsibilities explains why some prioritise completing their qualification. This covers the task well, but the two sides are not developed equally: the first example focuses mainly on personal financial skills, and the second view would benefit from a more specific explanation of how concentrating on a degree helps students or their families. Your conclusion restates your position, though it largely repeats earlier points. More balanced development and a fuller explanation of the consequences of each view would strengthen the response.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, your opinion, and a conclusion. Signposts such as “To begin with” and “On the other hand” make the contrast easy to follow, and the main position remains consistent. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. For example, “For that reason” introduces the consequence of family expectations, but the relationship between those expectations and finishing a degree quickly could be explained more precisely. The opinion paragraph also repeats the introduction and conclusion rather than advancing the argument. Use referencing carefully and link each example back to the paragraph’s main claim to make progression smoother and less repetitive.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of vocabulary for the topic, including “major subjects,” “explore different opportunities,” “job market,” and “think about a decision critically.” These choices communicate the main ideas, and some attempts at more formal phrasing are evident. However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “minor courses” for additional subjects, “how real world think,” and “contribute in financial planning.” The spelling error “alllow” also shows that proofreading is needed. Repeated use of “subjects,” “students,” and “time and effort” limits flexibility. Aim for more precise academic collocations and vary repeated terms—for instance, use “broaden their knowledge” or “complement their degree studies” where appropriate.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex forms, including a conditional example (“if a student… wants to study…”) and subordinate clauses explaining reasons. Meaning is generally clear, and the essay’s sentence structures are varied enough to express comparison and cause. Some grammatical errors remain, however. In “one of the significant reason,” the noun should be plural; “the reason for this that” is missing a verb; and “their family work hard” has a subject–verb agreement problem. There are also issues with articles and sentence construction in “how real world think about a matter.” Review agreement, articles, and complete clause structure, then proofread each sentence. Greater accuracy across these patterns would make your complex sentences more controlled.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.