Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-08-07

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is argued that some college student want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects but others prefer to spent all their time and attention to studying in their subject. In my opinion both have good and bad impact depending on the students wishes.

If you can multitasking on your university and want to study at diffrend main subjects you can learn another subject with by taking on a side job. You can learn something new like communication, outreach, and new skill in your line of work. But, you cannot focus in your main subjects if you just can focus in one subject.

Meanwhile if you just can focus in one subject you must learn the main subject with dillegent without think about another subject because you can get the best result in your major than others. But, you just can one fieldand lack the flexibility required in today’s modern job market.

To expand on the first view, taking up additional subjects or engaging in complementary practical experiences broadens a student's horizons. In an increasingly interconnected world, employers value multidisciplinary knowledge. For instance, a computer science student who takes optional modules in business communication or graphic design becomes far more versatile than one who relies solely on coding skills. Acquiring diverse competencies allows graduates to adapt to unexpected career shifts and collaborate effectively with professionals from different fields.

On the other hand, the argument for complete specialization is equally compelling. Certain demanding disciplines, such as medicine, law, or engineering, require an extraordinary amount of dedication and deep academic rigor. Students who split their focus across unrelated areas risk burning out or failing to master the complex fundamentals of their main field. By devoting all their energy to a single path, students can achieve academic excellence, secure higher grades, and build a strong theoretical foundation that makes them specialists in their domain.

In conclusion, both approaches offer distinct advantages depending on an individual's career goals and learning capacity. While extreme specialization produces high-level experts, a broader education yields adaptable, well-rounded individuals. Ultimately, I believe students should strive for a balanced approach: focusing primarily on mastering their core qualification while taking advantage of introductory courses or practical experiences in secondary areas whenever possible.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

Tanggapan ini menjawab semua bagian dari perintah soal, membahas kedua pandangan dan memberikan opini pribadi yang jelas. Ide-idenya dikembangkan dengan baik, terutama pada bagian kedua esai. Namun, dua paragraf isi pertama agak repetitif dan mengandung frasa yang membingungkan, seperti 'If you can multitasking on your university'. Meskipun posisi Anda jelas di sepanjang esai, paragraf awal kurang memiliki kecanggihan dibandingkan paragraf selanjutnya, yang memengaruhi pengembangan keseluruhan. Kesimpulan secara efektif menyintesis argumen dan memberikan sikap akhir yang seimbang, memenuhi persyaratan untuk performa Band 6.5 atau 7.0.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

Esai ini disusun secara logis dengan pembagian paragraf yang jelas. Terdapat perkembangan ide dari pendahuluan hingga kesimpulan. Perangkat kohesi digunakan, seperti 'Meanwhile', 'To expand on the first view', dan 'On the other hand', yang membantu memandu pembaca. Namun, beberapa transisi terasa mekanis, dan kohesi internal dalam paragraf kedua dan ketiga sedikit terhambat oleh struktur kalimat yang canggung dan kesalahan tata bahasa. Terlepas dari masalah kecil ini, struktur keseluruhan koheren dan mudah diikuti, yang membenarkan Band 7.0.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

Siswa menunjukkan jangkauan kosakata yang cukup untuk membahas topik tersebut. Ada upaya untuk menggunakan kata-kata yang kurang umum seperti 'multidisciplinary', 'versatile', 'academic rigor', dan 'fundamentals'. Meskipun ada beberapa kesalahan dalam pemilihan kata dan ejaan (contoh: 'dillegent', 'diffrend'), hal ini tidak menghambat komunikasi. Kosakata secara umum sesuai untuk tugas ini, meskipun kurang memiliki presisi yang konsisten dan kolokasi alami yang diperlukan untuk band yang lebih tinggi. Jangkauannya memadai untuk Band 6.5.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

Tanggapan ini menunjukkan campuran struktur kalimat sederhana dan kompleks. Terdapat kesalahan tata bahasa yang sering muncul, terutama pada paruh pertama esai, seperti 'some college student want', 'prefer to spent', dan 'without think about'. Kesalahan ini terlihat jelas namun tidak menghalangi pembaca untuk memahami makna yang dimaksud. Paruh kedua esai menunjukkan kontrol yang lebih baik, dengan struktur yang lebih kompleks digunakan dengan benar. Mengingat frekuensi kesalahan di bagian awal, skor mencerminkan keseimbangan antara keberhasilan penggunaan struktur kompleks dan kesalahan dasar yang masih terus terjadi.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.