Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-08-23

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

There is ongoing debate about whether university students should concentrate exclusively on their main field of study or explore additional subjects. Although focusing on a qualification can help students develop special knowledge, I believe that studying a limited number of other disciplines provides valuable skills and a broader perspective.

Those who support complete specialisation argue that degree programs are already academically demanding. Students in fields such as medicine, engineering and pure science must absorb a substantial amount of complex information and develop practical skills within a limited period. If they spend too much time to unrelated subjects, their academic performance may get harm, potentially reducing their future employment prospects. Moreover, some professions require an exceptionally high level of expertise. A medical student, for instance, has a responsibility to master clinical knowledge and procedures, and taking numerous optional courses in unrelated areas could distract them from this essential training.

Despite this, lerning about other disciplines can offer significant academic and professional benefits. Modern workplaces increasingly require employees to combine knowledge from various fields. For example, a computer science student who studies business may be better prepared to establish a technology company, Additional subjects can also develop transferable skills, such as critical thinking, communication and creativity, which may not be emphasised sufficiently within a highly specialised programme. Furthermore, exposure to different disciplines can help students discover interests and abilities that influence their future career discipline.

In my view majority of students should focus on their primary field of learning however a small proportion in extra curriculam activities should introduced to students. this allows them to maintain a balance in both their general study and their other qualification in order to adapt.

In conclusion, exclusive concentration maybe neccesery in order to achive expertise, but carefully chosen additional subject may help an individual to greatly enhance one's future regarding to employment. Therefore a combinations of these two has more realistic approach.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses all parts of the prompt, discussing both views and providing a clear personal opinion. The ideas are relevant and generally well-developed, particularly the arguments regarding the demands of specialized fields like medicine and the benefits of interdisciplinary knowledge. However, the conclusion and the final paragraph are slightly underdeveloped and contain some awkward phrasing that obscures the clarity of the position. While the main body paragraphs are strong, the final summary could have been more precise in articulating the 'balance' mentioned. Overall, the response fulfills the requirements of the task effectively.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is logically organized with a clear progression of ideas. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the two viewpoints and the personal opinion. Cohesive devices such as 'Moreover', 'Despite this', and 'Furthermore' are used effectively to link ideas. However, there are some minor issues with referencing and flow in the final two paragraphs, where the connection between sentences becomes slightly disjointed. For instance, the transition in the final paragraph is a bit abrupt. Despite these minor lapses, the overall structure is coherent and easy to follow.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The student demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to discuss the topic with some precision, using terms like 'specialisation', 'transferable skills', and 'interdisciplinary'. There are some spelling errors ('lerning', 'neccesery', 'achive') and minor collocation issues, such as 'performance may get harm' instead of 'may be harmed' and 'future career discipline' instead of 'future career path'. While these errors are noticeable, they do not impede communication. The vocabulary is generally appropriate for an academic context, though it lacks the sophistication required for a higher band score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There is good control over complex sentences, such as 'Although focusing on a qualification can help students develop special knowledge, I believe that...'. However, there are frequent grammatical errors, particularly with subject-verb agreement and article usage, such as 'a small proportion in extra curriculam activities should introduced' and 'a combinations of these two has more realistic approach'. Punctuation is generally functional, but there are missing commas and some awkward phrasing that affects the overall fluency of the writing.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.