Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-09-27
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
This modern youth experiencing the new education system than ever before.It is an argued issue whether adding curiculum activities and side subbjects in syllabus except to keep only main subjects. some people believe that central subjects such as mathemetics, science, social science are more crucial rather than side subjects.I personally agree with former point of view.
This paragraph will discuss about plathora of additional subjects along with main subjects. younger generation are too useful with technology and lern something through screen therefore their physical life is most affected. So that, addition of sports subjects in circular is helps to come out through gudgets and it gives chance to children for improve fitness. Furthermore, Such intresting subjects are very significant to engross such skills. For instance, singing classes, dancing , swiming, self defense techniques, theater courses exectra. addition of these types of coaching make child skillfull along with healthy lifestyle in future.
On the other hand, group of people thinks targeting on main majors is important for improve grades in result. There are some subjects are as imprtant as other side subjects. Such as science, Mathematics , social science, physics and chemistry and all. Nevertheless not every student are capable to claim grades in all these kind of subjects that`s why parents are force to them focusing only main subjects rather than side subjects.
To conclude, Universities have provide to all kind of stream and parents should provide freedome of choice in choose intresting subjects of student. Significance of adding other subjects with main subjects have more positive effect on lerner.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
The response addresses all parts of the task by discussing both views on whether students should learn additional subjects or focus solely on their main qualifications, and the writer provides a clear personal opinion. The ideas are relevant, such as mentioning physical health, technology habits, and academic pressures. However, some ideas are underdeveloped or lack depth, and the discussion tends to drift into minor details like specific activities (singing, dancing, swimming) rather than fully exploring the broader educational implications of the two perspectives. The position is maintained throughout, but the depth of argument places this response firmly at the Band 5.5 to 6.0 level.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
The essay is divided into four paragraphs, showing an attempt at a logical structure with an introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. However, paragraphing and referencing are sometimes faulty and mechanical. For example, the transition phrases like 'This paragraph will discuss about...' and 'On the other hand, group of people thinks...' are overly formulaic and clumsy. The progression of ideas within paragraphs is frequently disrupted by abrupt shifts and unclear referencing, such as 'Such intresting subjects' without clear antecedents. Overall cohesion lacks smoothness, leading to a score in the lower band range.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary to attempt the task, including words like 'curriculum', 'technology', and 'qualification'. However, there are numerous noticeable errors in word choice, spelling, and collocation throughout the text, such as 'curiculum', 'subbjects', 'mathemetics', 'plathora', 'gudgets', 'intresting', and 'exectra'. These errors and limited control over less common lexical items cause some difficulty for the reader and prevent the response from achieving a higher band score.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The writing demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, but attempts at complex structures are frequently faulty. There are persistent grammatical errors throughout the text, such as missing articles, incorrect prepositions, subject-verb agreement issues, and tense errors ('This modern youth experiencing...', 'addition of sports subjects in circular is helps...', 'every student are capable...', 'Universities have provide...'). Punctuation and capitalization errors are also common, notably missing spaces after periods. These frequent errors occasionally cause confusion, though meaning can generally still be deciphered.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.